Teams

PD40/Lee/FTC

2025 SC Singles 40 & Over - PD · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-01vs PD40/Timmons/PTCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMisty Lee vs Katarzyna Timmons1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAnita Crawford vs Jean Mcintosh6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-16vs PD40/Timmons/PTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesTamera King vs Katarzyna Timmons3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMisty Lee vs Pamela Cody6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesLaura Anne Hofler vs Jenny Thigpen6-2, 6-0
2025-10-09vs PD40/Timmons/PTCLost 03
L#1 SinglesKelli McGregor vs Katarzyna Timmons1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDara Hamilton vs Laurin Gandy3-4
L#3 SinglesTamera King vs Pamela Cody6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-02vs PD40/Timmons/PTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesKelli McGregor vs Pamela Cody6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMisty Lee vs Melvina Chappell6-4, 7-6
W#3 SinglesAnita Crawford vs Olga Pak6-0, 6-0
2025-09-25vs PD40/Timmons/PTCLost 12
L#1 SinglesTamera King vs Katarzyna Timmons7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKelli McGregor vs Laurin Gandy4-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesRobin Downing vs Olga Pak6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dara Hamilton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.67
Tamera King
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.57
Misty Lee
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.52
Kelli McGregor
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.50
Beth Dynan
published 3
2.47
Laura Anne Hofler
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.44
Robin Downing
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.27
Anita Crawford
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Misty Lee + Tamera King224 matchesnot enough data
Robin Downing + Misty Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dara Hamilton
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tamera King
23W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
Misty Lee
31W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
Kelli McGregor
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
3
Beth Dynan
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Laura Anne Hofler
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Robin Downing
19W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
3
Anita Crawford
10W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.