Teams

PS-ST

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · Men's 3.5 18s

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChris Stansbury vs Charles Lehman1-6, 0-6
2022-05-22vs Westwood 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSiew Yee Lee / Chris Stansbury vs Eric Guthrie / Doug Opalka7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2022-05-08vs Lost Creek StrikersLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlec Rhodes / Chris Stansbury vs Erik Qualman / Mark Thatcher2-6, 1-6
2022-05-01vs Tasteful TweenersLost 01
L#3 DoublesChris Stansbury / Michael Higgins vs Jason Fraley / Federico Gabaldon Jr0-6, 1-6
2022-04-24vs Swing It 18+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesFred Hause / Chris Stansbury vs Keith Parker / Lei Ji1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Chris Stansbury
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.47
Dan Mosley
published 3.5
2.88
STAN WONG
published
Fred Hause
published 3
2.65
Morris McMahon
published
Douglas Alexander
published
James Martin
published 0
Mario Carrillo
published
Michael Higgins
published
Nathaniel Miller
published
Siew Yee Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Higgins + Fred Hause6651% games+7.6% vs expected
Chris Stansbury + Dan Mosley13263% games+5.2% vs expected
Chris Stansbury + Fred Hause4263% gamesnot enough data
Nathaniel Miller + Chris Stansbury033 matchesnot enough data
Michael Higgins + Chris Stansbury123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Stansbury
71W–55L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Dan Mosley
47W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
STAN WONG
7W–41L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.88
3
Fred Hause
16W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Morris McMahon
7W–21L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Douglas Alexander
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
0
James Martin
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mario Carrillo
25W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Higgins
27W–46L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nathaniel Miller
3W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Siew Yee Lee
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.