Teams

ATC BLUE

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-17vs GAC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBarbara Fraser / Lina Wong-Kuljis vs Rebecca Givens / Ruth Mantle6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesErin Forsey vs Lauren Horsman4-6, 2-6
2026-08-03vs SKY BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesLina Wong-Kuljis / Jennie Hewitt vs Erin Mann / Denise Briere7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAllison Dodge vs Joelle Klein0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Pucillo / Dana Katz vs Rachel Byrne / Beth Godzich2-6, 1-6
2026-07-27vs EM REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennie Hewitt / Sarah Pucillo vs Lisa Allen / Susan Engeman6-2, 6-1
2026-07-20vs HW GOLDWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Dodge / Jennie Hewitt vs Julie King / Alicia Thorne6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Barbara Fraser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jennie Hewitt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Erin Forsey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.76
Sarah Pucillo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Lina Wong-Kuljis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Dana Katz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.59
Allison Dodge
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.46
Kim Bolt
published
2.39
Keely Downs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Fraser + Lina Wong-Kuljis3351% games−2.5% vs expected
Barbara Fraser + Jennie Hewitt4259% games−2.9% vs expected
Lina Wong-Kuljis + Jennie Hewitt3355% gamesnot enough data
Kim Bolt + Allison Dodge134 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Hewitt + Allison Dodge404 matchesnot enough data
Kim Bolt + Jennie Hewitt213 matchesnot enough data
Lina Wong-Kuljis + Allison Dodge033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barbara Fraser
21W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Jennie Hewitt
40W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Erin Forsey
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Sarah Pucillo
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Lina Wong-Kuljis
24W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
2.5
Dana Katz
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%24%76%
2.60
3
Allison Dodge
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
25%74%<1%
2.59
Kim Bolt
11W–15L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Keely Downs
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.