Teams

Olde Towne (Dave Rappe)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Adult 65 & Over Men · 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-17vs Cambridge (Rick Matarrese)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Clover / Alan Cristal vs David Hagan / Steven Miller0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Case / Steve Loomis vs Rick Matarrese / Joseph Polanski7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Rappe / Richie Pereira vs Ira Feingold / Roy Rucks6-0, 6-4
2025-10-31vs CC of Roswell (Bob Thomas)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesDennie Clark / Steve Clover vs Alan Balch / Joe Crews6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Loomis / Joel Schancupp vs Michael Krauter / Jack Priblo6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKen Leebow / Paul Case vs Mark Sutherland / James Nobles5-7, 3-6
2025-10-24vs Cambridge (Rick Matarrese)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDennie Clark / Steve Clover vs Ira Feingold / David Hagan6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Lefort / David Rappe vs Roy Rucks / Fred Pourmehr0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJagjeet Sidhu / Alan Cristal vs Patrick Matarrese / Tom Wohlbach4-6, 3-6
2025-10-13vs CC of Roswell (Bob Thomas)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Rappe / Steve Clover vs Michael Krauter / Mark Sutherland7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDennie Clark / Steve Loomis vs Alan Balch / Robert Thomas0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJagjeet Sidhu / Ken Leebow vs Ron Frieman / Dene Schoerner2-6, 4-6
2025-10-03vs Cambridge (Rick Matarrese)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDennie Clark / Alan Cristal vs David Hagan / Patrick Matarrese2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Clover / Michael Lefort vs Fred Pourmehr / Roy Rucks3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Rappe / Steve Loomis vs Tom Wohlbach / Ira Feingold6-3, 6-3
2025-09-19vs CC of Roswell (Bob Thomas)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSteve Clover / Alan Cristal vs Michael Krauter / Joe Crews0-6, 0-2
L#2 DoublesDennie Clark / Ken Leebow vs Mark Sutherland / Robert Thomas6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTom Cox / David Rappe vs Ron Frieman / Jack Priblo6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cambridge (Rick Matarrese)*5112616148
2CC of Roswell (Bob Thomas)*3310821173
3Olde Towne (Dave Rappe)*1551328187

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
George Wagner
published 3
2.79
Dennie Clark
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.79
Paul Case
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Irv Zimmerman
published 3
2.77
Steve Clover
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.76
David Rappe
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Irving Briks
published 3
2.74
Jagjeet Sidhu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Steve Loomis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.64
Richie Pereira
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Ken Leebow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Michael Lefort
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Alan Cristal
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Joel Schancupp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Kraus
published
Tom Cox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Clover + Dennie Clark4261% games+13.9% vs expected
Steve Loomis + Dennie Clark2549% games+5.5% vs expected
Steve Loomis + Paul Case5450% games+3.3% vs expected
Steve Loomis + Irv Zimmerman2354% games+2.6% vs expected
David Rappe + Michael Lefort3742% games−0.4% vs expected
Joel Schancupp + Irv Zimmerman7357% gamesnot enough data
Steve Loomis + David Rappe1543% gamesnot enough data
Steve Loomis + Steven Kraus2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
George Wagner
16W–17L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Dennie Clark
23W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Paul Case
13W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Irv Zimmerman
25W–29L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
Steve Clover
22W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
David Rappe
19W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Irving Briks
18W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Jagjeet Sidhu
10W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Steve Loomis
27W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
Richie Pereira
15W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Ken Leebow
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
Michael Lefort
11W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.54
3
Alan Cristal
16W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Joel Schancupp
21W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Steven Kraus
13W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tom Cox
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.