Teams

Baker 6.5 Combo 18

2026 Decatur Southern Combo 18 and Over · 6.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.14 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-27vs Lamar 6.5 Combo 18Won 30
W#1 DoublesAndrew Plankenhorn / Eugene Acupan vs Dewayne Maze / Kip Potter6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPerry Baker / Timothy Nave vs Zach Ingrum / Andrew Devine6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAllen Hines / Bill Allen vs Jeb Williamson / Tollin Toler6-1, 6-0
2026-08-15vs Lamar 6.5 Combo 18Won 20
W#1 DoublesGordon Siek / Derek Epp vs Rishi Patel / David Stisher6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAllen Hines / Bill Allen vs Chuck Lamar / Joshua Zona6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-11vs Proctor 6.5 Combo 18Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTravis Gundolff / Chris Mukadam vs Josh Wisener / Joey Rushing2-6, 1-2
L#3 DoublesBill Allen / David Parnell vs Christopher Proctor / Kevin Stone4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-02vs Lamar 6.5 Combo 18Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCarl Toussaint / Gordon Siek vs David Stisher / Jeff Griffis7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAllen Hines / Chris Mukadam vs Andrew Devine / Dewayne Maze4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDenny Smith / Keith Sexton vs Jeb Williamson / Keelan Lawyer1-6, 1-6
2026-07-29vs Proctor 6.5 Combo 18Lost 12
W#1 DoublesPerry Baker / Derek Epp vs Joseph Marks / Jason Seale6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTravis Gundolff / Bill Allen vs Josh Wisener / Joey Rushing6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeith Sexton / Chris Mukadam vs Christopher Proctor / Rajan Patel2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Proctor 6.5 Combo 184093883
2Baker 6.5 Combo 18136614104
3Lamar 6.5 Combo 18133918118
4zz not playing000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Andrew Plankenhorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Perry Baker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Travis Gundolff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Allen Hines
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Gordon Siek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Keith Sexton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Eugene Acupan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Derek Epp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Timothy Nave
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
David Parnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Denny Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Carl Toussaint
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Chris Mukadam
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Perry Baker + Andrew Plankenhorn033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Plankenhorn
46W–103L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Perry Baker
22W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Travis Gundolff
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Allen Hines
21W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Gordon Siek
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Keith Sexton
15W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Eugene Acupan
16W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Derek Epp
37W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Timothy Nave
29W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
David Parnell
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Denny Smith
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Carl Toussaint
11W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Chris Mukadam
0W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.