Teams

LA - Team V

2023 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-20vs LA - MountainGate GatorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Aditya Agarkar vs Douglas Frank / Casondra Ruga7-5, 6-3
2023-03-18vs LA - Queen AnneSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSona Arutyunyan / Aditya Agarkar vs Diana Chow / Duc Le6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / DEAN BENJAMIN vs Claudine Shiva / Marc Burkow1-6, 2-6
2023-03-04vs LA - Shadow's AcesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Aditya Agarkar vs Mia Babilonia / Lloyd Liang6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSona Arutyunyan / Steve Tiseo vs Maria Starn / Reynold Krieg6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-20vs LA - Kiss My AceWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteve Tiseo / Sona Arutyunyan vs Alec Moore / Carter Ashforth6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Aditya Agarkar vs Mallika Arora / Krunal Mistry7-5, 6-2
2023-02-05vs LA - LATCWon 10
W#1 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Aditya Agarkar vs Karen Swerdlow / Jesse Dang6-2, 6-3
2023-02-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Aditya Agarkar vs Kelly Durbin / Jake Fishman6-4, 6-3
2023-01-21vs LA - Mulholland MixedWon 10
W#1 DoublesAditya Agarkar / Sona Arutyunyan vs Suzanne Robinson / Jon Kraft6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Sona Arutyunyan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Vilayvanh Shah
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Candice Hung
published 4
3.60
Shannon Minor
published
3.48
Aditya Agarkar
published 4
3.35
Mary Kayne
published
3.11
Raymond Bertrand
published
3.05
Andrea Kinloch
published 3.5
Kirk Steinam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vilayvanh Shah + Sona Arutyunyan361557% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sona Arutyunyan
174W–87L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Vilayvanh Shah
194W–89L career · 6 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Candice Hung
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shannon Minor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Aditya Agarkar
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
Mary Kayne
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.35
Raymond Bertrand
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Andrea Kinloch
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Kirk Steinam
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.