Teams

Centercourt Racquettes

2026 18&over Women Day Winter · 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-04-07vs Sugar and SliceWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Finan / Jeanne Satagaj vs Montserrat Kim / Marci Clark6-4, 6-0
2026-03-24vs Westfield 3.0 #2Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Finan / Jeanne Satagaj vs Christine Ryberg / Jamie Furia6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-17vs Westfield 3.0 #1Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanne Satagaj / Jennifer Santori vs Juliet Traum / Marissa Perlman2-6, 2-6
2026-03-10vs West OrangeWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeanne Satagaj / Jennifer Santori vs Rosemary Mattson / Marilyn Wright6-2, 7-6
2026-02-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesDawn Eckert / Marla Sanders vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-10vs SAC LadiesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanne Satagaj / Jean Sorabella vs Andrea Kischkat / Kimberly Brick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-03vs Love and DeucesLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Bauer / Jeanne Satagaj vs Kaitlin Henke / Heather Campanaro2-6, 6-7
2026-01-27vs Hot ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Finan / Jeanne Satagaj vs Helen Black / Maria Francis6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-20vs NJD: Glam SlamLost 13
L#1 DoublesHeather Finan / Tracey Katchen vs Elizabeth Robins / Patricia Cattaruzzi6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Bruno vs Monika Korolkiewicz6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeanne Satagaj / Michele de Burgh Codrington vs Coleen Mills / Ruthann Kerr2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDiana Huang / Jennifer Santori vs Kandace Simpson / Ana Romano2-6, 2-6
2026-01-13vs Crestmont Miss HitsLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Finan / Jeanne Satagaj vs Anna Treece / Jaymi Gutman5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Jeanne Satagaj
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.85
Michelle Bruno
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Diana Huang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Heather Finan
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
2.60
Marla Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dawn Eckert
published
Jean Sorabella
published
Jennifer Santori
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Lefkowitz
published
Kimberly Bauer
published
Marisa Barron
published
Michele de Burgh Codrington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sheela Lee
published
Stacey Lang
published
Tracey Katchen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Katchen + Kimberly Bauer4257% games+7.2% vs expected
Michele de Burgh Codrington + Sheela Lee5553% games−0.5% vs expected
Heather Finan + Michelle Bruno2346% games−1.9% vs expected
Marla Sanders + Heather Finan1741% games−3.0% vs expected
Marla Sanders + Tracey Katchen3543% games−10.9% vs expected
Marla Sanders + Kimberly Bauer4163% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Bauer + Marisa Barron314 matchesnot enough data
Heather Finan + Tracey Katchen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jeanne Satagaj
23W–36L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Michelle Bruno
30W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Diana Huang
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Heather Finan
32W–103L career · 9 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Marla Sanders
15W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Dawn Eckert
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jean Sorabella
6W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Santori
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Karen Lefkowitz
4W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Bauer
15W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Marisa Barron
14W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele de Burgh Codrington
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sheela Lee
13W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacey Lang
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracey Katchen
12W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.