Teams

LATA40/Andrews/MP

2025 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.0 - Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-18vs LATA40/Geib/CAMPLost 14
W#1 DoublesCindy Corley / Jen Nelson vs Anne Belue / Beverly Campbell6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJanice Probst vs Chrissy Boone2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTami Richardson / Lynn Hammond vs Lisette Geib / Beth Belcher3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdrienne Wright / Mae Andrews vs Willine Gilliard / Juanita Bowens5-7, 2-6
L#4 DoublesRebecca Keilty / Karen Buzzetti vs Libby Hagins / Helen Cupertino4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.0 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Jen Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Tammie King
published
2.90
Adrienne Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cindy Corley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Lynn Hammond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Mae Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Tami Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Misty Pearson
published
2.52
Joy Krause
published
2.50
Karen Buzzetti
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Rebecca Keilty
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Janice Probst
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Meredith Keane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Keilty + Karen Buzzetti2641% games+3.7% vs expected
Tami Richardson + Mae Andrews224 matchesnot enough data
Joy Krause + Mae Andrews224 matchesnot enough data
Misty Pearson + Lynn Hammond134 matchesnot enough data
Karen Buzzetti + Lynn Hammond033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jen Nelson
28W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
Tammie King
40W–38L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Adrienne Wright
20W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Cindy Corley
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Hammond
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Mae Andrews
20W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Tami Richardson
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Misty Pearson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Joy Krause
5W–28L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Karen Buzzetti
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Rebecca Keilty
15W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Janice Probst
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.24
Meredith Keane
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.