Teams

300 - Pauly

2024 Alachua Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.95 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-08-25vs Alachua/Banes/18&OverMxdLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Hou / Alison Andrus vs Peter Kim / Emily Dace1-6, 3-6
2024-08-17vs Alachua/Blair18&OverMxdSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJD Wright / Jenny Neelands vs Kelly Banes / Andrew Diaz6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Sager / Josh Spink vs Braedon Fulton / Rachel Rodriguez3-6, 6-7
2024-08-13vs Alachua/Banes/18&OverMxdLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlejandro Pauly / Alison Andrus vs Peter Kim / Emily Dace0-6, 5-7
2024-08-09vs Alachua/Banes/18&OverMxdLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Hou / Alison Andrus vs Braedon Fulton / Morgan Jordan0-6, 3-6
2024-08-07vs Alachua/Blair18&OverMxdWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Hou / Ashley Spink vs Braedon Fulton / Rachel Rodriguez6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlison Andrus / Rupen Shah vs Camilo Fita / Kelly Banes2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-08-06vs JTC - Cribb/PorterWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlejandro Pauly / Alison Andrus vs CLAUDIA ARAUJO / Harrison Thibault7-5, 6-3
2024-08-01vs JTC - Cribb/PorterWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Sagas / Alejandro Pauly vs Jigisha Shah / Ross van Boven6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRupen Shah / Amanda Fuller vs Robert Taylor / CLAUDIA ARAUJO2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Sager / Josh Spink vs Tracey Bryant / Harrison Thibault6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-07-07vs JTC - Cribb/PorterLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlison Andrus / Corey Sobers vs Ali Messenger / Ross van Boven3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRupen Shah / Amanda Fuller vs Courtney Woody / Derek Li3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Neelands / Josh Spink vs Roy Cribb / Cynthia Thibault4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-30vs Alachua/Banes/18&OverMxdLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlejandro Pauly / Alison Andrus vs Spencer Neville / Paige Nicholson1-6, 0-6
2024-06-27vs Alachua/Blair18&OverMxdLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Hou / Margot Maurer vs Peter Kim / Anita Rajasekhar2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEric Esterline / Ashley Spink vs Darby Townsend / Andrew Diaz2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMadison Sagas / JD Wright vs Camilo Fita / Ekanong van Roy6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-06-15vs JTC - Cribb/PorterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Sager / Rupen Shah vs Jigisha Shah / Robert Taylor0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Pauly / Jenny Neelands vs Ali Messenger / David Porter6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-06vs Alachua/Blair18&OverMxdLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlison Andrus / Josh Spink vs Peter Kim / Anita Rajasekhar0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Alejandro Pauly
published 4.5
4.09
Julie Sager
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
4.01
Madison Sagas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.85
Jenny Neelands
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.84
Alison Andrus
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Josh Spink
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.62
Boris Kuchuk
published 4
3.55
Corey Sobers
published 4
3.53
Rupen Shah
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.52
Kim Magee
published
3.46
Ashley Spink
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Margot Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Eric Esterline
published
Maria Curatolo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Spink + Jenny Neelands4652% games+2.6% vs expected
Rupen Shah + Julie Sager6443% gamesnot enough data
Rupen Shah + Ashley Spink4258% gamesnot enough data
Alison Andrus + Josh Spink2342% gamesnot enough data
Alison Andrus + Rupen Shah224 matchesnot enough data
Madison Sagas + Josh Spink404 matchesnot enough data
Josh Spink + Julie Sager123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alejandro Pauly
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.25
4
Julie Sager
182W–66L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
4.09
4
Madison Sagas
47W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Jenny Neelands
243W–94L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Alison Andrus
79W–67L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Josh Spink
186W–129L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Boris Kuchuk
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Corey Sobers
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Rupen Shah
200W–161L career · 7 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kim Magee
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Ashley Spink
133W–63L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Margot Maurer
51W–79L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Eric Esterline
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Curatolo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.