Teams

JACKSON

2022 Loudoun Adult Other Winter Afternoon Doubles Women · Adult Other Afternoon Doubles 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-15vs LARNER/HOPKINSLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Poretz / Cheryl Danner vs Jessica Egenrieder / Jennifer DeCamp7-6, 4-5
2022-03-08vs KAPLANSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Poretz / Donna Tanner vs Renee Wall / Lisa Wolff6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBridget Costigan / Cheryl Danner vs Erin Kaplan / Joanna Baltes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-01vs ROELLIGWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Carter / Jill Poretz vs Brenda Bosch / Margaret Navin7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Danner / Allison Broadbent vs Jill Brown / Catherine Mitchell7-5, 6-4
2022-02-11vs LARNER/HOPKINSWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Poretz / Angela Goodman vs Maureen Bornholdt / Laura Sagen6-3, 6-2
2022-01-26vs ROELLIGWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Poretz / Cheryl Danner vs Tamara Lindquist / Brenda Bosch2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-01-20vs NIXWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Poretz / Cheryl Danner vs Christina Schinner / Moira Smith2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Other Afternoon Doubles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Angela Goodman
published 4
Bridget Costigan
published 4
3.60
Jill Poretz
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.38
Cheryl Danner
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.19
Kate Putt
published
3.17
Jennifer Gick
published
3.07
Karla Zedan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Poretz + Cheryl Danner4745% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Goodman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bridget Costigan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jill Poretz
305W–215L career · 6 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Cheryl Danner
137W–193L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Kate Putt
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Jennifer Gick
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
Karla Zedan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.