Teams

CP: Jags and StagsPolizzi/Barban

2024 SCT Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed - 1

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-07vs MIT:Smart Aces:LorenzettiWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Smith / Joseph Zalis vs Andrew Taylor / Arla Wiles7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Demarco / Taneya Ng vs Donald Dib / Deirdre Chrostowski6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJaime Wilkes / Daniel Eilertsen vs Ellen McCabe / James Webb6-3, 6-4
2024-05-31vs OGTA:Net Setters:Rivers/GetzelmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaime Wilkes / Matthew Healy vs Thomas Sedgwick / Rachel Hager6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShirley Barban / Steve Petricone vs Elaine Arbizo / Ernest Arbizo6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJavier Flores / Amy Muslim vs Eloina Cortes / Joshua Lathrop6-1, 6-0
2024-05-17vs MIT: 40+ Mixed:Sikora/LorenzettiWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Polizzi / Joseph Zalis vs Jill Grego / Forest Leonard6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Raskopf / Richard Conklin vs Michele Shaw / Craig Dellert6-0, 6-1
2024-05-03vs CP:Chelsea Piers: FineWon 21
W#1 DoublesShirley Barban / Steve Petricone vs Laurie Findeisen / David Seah7-5, 6-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Smith / Javier Flores vs Megan Powell / Gray Powell4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDanielle Polizzi / Daniel Eilertsen vs Mary Abbazia / JOSEPH DORAN6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-12vs 4S:SCC Spinners:SchmauchWon 30
W#1 DoublesJaime Wilkes / Matthew Healy vs Maureen Ireland / Patrick Moffett6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShirley Barban / Michael Demarco vs Nicole Opalinski / Michael Daly6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Muslim / Richard Conklin vs Erin Daly / Timothy Murphy6-1, 6-1
2024-03-09vs NC:Bad Aces 40+:GillWon 21
W#1 DoublesShirley Barban / Matthew Healy vs Jerry Hupy / Leslie Mallon6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJaime Wilkes / Richard Conklin vs Scott Roe / Lei Liang6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDanielle Polizzi / Daniel Eilertsen vs Chris Flood / Teresa Shafir1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesMatthew Healy / Jaime Wilkes vs Paul Adams / Christine Gaspar6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShirley Barban / Javier Flores vs Kenneth Grice / Heather Nelson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Muslim / Steve Petricone vs Jennifer Luongo / Joe Patterson6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed - 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Taneya Ng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Jaime Wilkes
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.93
Shirley Barban
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.91
Joseph Zalis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Javier Flores
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Amy Muslim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Steve Petricone
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Danielle Polizzi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Amy Raskopf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Daniel Eilertsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Richard Conklin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
M Tang
published
Matthew Healy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Demarco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Javier Flores + Shirley Barban4363% games+18.3% vs expected
Shirley Barban + Matthew Healy5253% gamesnot enough data
Shirley Barban + Michael Demarco6156% gamesnot enough data
Jaime Wilkes + Matthew Healy6078% gamesnot enough data
Amy Muslim + Javier Flores3355% gamesnot enough data
Richard Conklin + Amy Raskopf3259% gamesnot enough data
Richard Conklin + Danielle Polizzi3256% gamesnot enough data
Richard Conklin + Amy Muslim224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taneya Ng
41W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Jaime Wilkes
106W–88L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.06
Shirley Barban
86W–78L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Joseph Zalis
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
Javier Flores
29W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Amy Muslim
49W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Steve Petricone
116W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Danielle Polizzi
69W–72L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Amy Raskopf
43W–40L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Daniel Eilertsen
2W–5L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Conklin
67W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
M Tang
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Healy
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Demarco
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.