Teams

KS/Unrein/18&Over4.5M

2021 KS 18 & Over Adult Outdoor League · 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-07-26vs Watson - TopekaWon 40
W#1 DoublesIan Clifton / Dustin Wiens vs Tim Swope / Jimmy Watson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChad Unrein vs Cory Clutter6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Mansfield / Shivraj Patil vs Chris Boiteau / Kurt Reid6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLong Pham / Ben McCouch vs Trung Bui / Jamie Robinson6-2, 6-2
2021-07-17vs Watson - TopekaWon 40
W#1 DoublesChad Unrein / Dustin Wiens vs Kurt Reid / Jamie Robinson6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesShivraj Patil vs Jimmy Watson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesIan Clifton / Mitchel Whitmer vs Cory Clutter / Tim Swope6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBen McCouch / Long Pham vs Chris Boiteau / Trung Bui6-1, 6-1
2021-07-17vs Watson - TopekaWon 40
W#1 DoublesShivraj Patil / Dustin Wiens vs Kurt Reid / Trung Bui6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMitchel Whitmer vs Tim Swope6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIan Clifton / Robert Mansfield vs Chris Boiteau / Jimmy Watson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBen McCouch / Long Pham vs Cory Clutter / Jamie Robinson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KS/Unrein/18&Over4.5M30141265
2Watson - Topeka0311428173

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Zach Loomis
published
4.23
Mitchel Whitmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.20
Chad Unrein
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Ben McCouch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Shivraj Patil
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Ian Clifton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Long Pham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Unrein + Ben McCouch2450% games−3.2% vs expected
Long Pham + Ben McCouch7069% gamesnot enough data
Ian Clifton + Chad Unrein314 matchesnot enough data
Chad Unrein + Zach Loomis314 matchesnot enough data
Shivraj Patil + Chad Unrein303 matchesnot enough data
Chad Unrein + Long Pham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zach Loomis
52W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.29
Mitchel Whitmer
41W–30L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Chad Unrein
65W–34L career · 2 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
Ben McCouch
21W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
4.13
Shivraj Patil
29W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
3.81
Ian Clifton
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Long Pham
51W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.