Teams

BBTL55/Ravens/Rose Hill TLC

55 & Over · 55 & Over 9.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-18vs LCTA55/McKay/Wild DunesLost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas McEvoy / Michael Mitchell vs Shawn Harris / Frederick McKay3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Brittis / Stephen Nitz vs Gary Agardy / Bo Crouch1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnthony Brittis / Steve Simone vs Ronald Goodwin / George Jarck0-6, 1-6
2025-05-18vs LCTA55/Viljac/MPRDWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Mitchell / Thomas McEvoy vs Walt Weekley / Richard Owens6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Tillison / John Brittis vs Brent Michael / Will Smith6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Nitz / Robert Cobb vs Daniel Strickland / Troy Marguglio6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-05-17vs HHTL55/Lieberman/SPCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Tillison / John Brittis vs Daniel Lieberman / James Demos1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnthony Brittis / Steve Simone vs Shawn Oliver / Gabriel Fornari0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Mitchell / Thomas McEvoy vs Peter Kolaric / Al Cannon3-6, 3-6
2025-05-17vs LLAS UPTA55A/Kim/SportsclubWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephen Nitz / Steve Simone vs Brian Laufenberg / Joo Ho Kim5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesThomas McEvoy / Robert Cobb vs Kevin Hall / Daryl Tracey7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Tillison / Michael Mitchell vs Steve Miller / Brian Okraska7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 9.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Adam Ravens
published 4.5
3.91
Anthony Brittis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.81
Stephen Nitz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
John Brittis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kurt Kamperman
published
Robert Cobb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Tillison
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Simone
published
Thomas McEvoy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam Ravens
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.95
4.5
Anthony Brittis
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
Stephen Nitz
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.81
John Brittis
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kurt Kamperman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Cobb
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Tillison
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Simone
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas McEvoy
8W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.