Teams

Feder (North Miami Beach Tennis Center)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.29 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-13vs Radillo (Ron Ehmann)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesIvet Hernandez / Cindy Conine vs Janine Burke / Michele Drucker1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRossana OKAMURA / Vladlena Funk vs Miriam Radillo / Bianca Alvarez1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarci Feder / AYelen Gragg vs Carin Blanchard / Steffi Kordy6-0, 6-2
2023-05-06vs Sosa (Crandon Park)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMarci Feder / AYelen Gragg vs Cecilia Sicardi / Claudia Wilkins7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurie Mathews / Valeria Ricotta vs Sandra Deering / Cynthia Latham2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly OMahony / Vladlena Funk vs Helene Buechele / Rommy Chang6-7, 0-6
2023-04-15vs Sosa (Crandon Park)Won 20
W#2 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Valeria Ricotta vs Wendy Sosa / Olga MariaForgas2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSherril Colombo / Cindy Conine vs Lesley Hernandez / Marilu Becerra6-0, 6-1
2023-04-01vs Miami-Dade/TeamRiviera/40&Over4.5WSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAli Quintero / Ivet Hernandez vs Laura Herskowitz / Ellen Malherbe4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKimberly OMahony vs CAROLINA CAMPUZANO1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesValeria Ricotta / AYelen Gragg vs Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz / Natalia Moll6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarci Feder / Sherril Colombo vs Jill Reiter / Allison Cohen6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-18vs Miami-Dade/TeamRiviera/40&Over4.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Mathews / Sherril Colombo vs Gabriela Castanon / Alaina Fotiu-Wojtowicz3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA / Cristina Nicholls vs Laura Herskowitz / Helena Maseda2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarci Feder / AYelen Gragg vs Maira Maguire / Adriana Umana6-4, 6-2
2023-03-11vs Radillo (Ron Ehmann)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMaria Hernandez / AYelen Gragg vs Michele Drucker / Janine Burke4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaurie Mathews / Valeria Ricotta vs Christine Padron / Lesley Harrington6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAli Quintero / Ivet Hernandez vs Jill Rickey / Mariel Cordero6-1, 6-3
2023-03-04vs Haney (Crandon Park)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLaurie Mathews / Valeria Ricotta vs Rose Haney / Barbara Viscito6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesIvet Hernandez / Ali Quintero vs Catherine Morgan / Hilary Landorf6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Rossana OKAMURA vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-21vs Haney (Crandon Park)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAYelen Gragg / Rossana OKAMURA vs Eliana Brooke / Alicia Senior7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesIvet Hernandez vs Suzanne Siegler6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Mathews / Cindy Conine vs Rose Haney / Katherine Kelly6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
AYelen Gragg
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.38
Ivet Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.30
Cindy Conine
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Laurie Mathews
published
4.12
Sherril Colombo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.04
Valeria Ricotta
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.03
Marci Feder
published
4.02
Kimberly OMahony
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.74
NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Rossana OKAMURA
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.44
Carla Martin
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valeria Ricotta + AYelen Gragg12263% games+6.7% vs expected
Valeria Ricotta + Laurie Mathews4351% games−2.3% vs expected
NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA + Rossana OKAMURA3257% gamesnot enough data
AYelen Gragg + Rossana OKAMURA404 matchesnot enough data
Ivet Hernandez + Rossana OKAMURA404 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Mathews + Marci Feder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
AYelen Gragg
83W–23L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.50
Ivet Hernandez
141W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Cindy Conine
115W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
4.30
Laurie Mathews
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Sherril Colombo
63W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Valeria Ricotta
48W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.04
Marci Feder
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Kimberly OMahony
77W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA
147W–107L career · 1 line in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Rossana OKAMURA
267W–161L career · 7 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Carla Martin
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.