Teams

Oak Hill:Bartl-Conley/Rivers

Twilight · Women Division II

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-10Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesCarli Rivers / Nicole Pereira vs Keegan Fisher / Leah Gordon6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-27vs Midtown: Crandall/RuffoLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesDawn Deperrior / Sara Ressler vs Kim Bender / Katherine Ruffo6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 Female DoublesCarli Rivers / Katie Lennox vs Sandra Nakandakari Higa / Nancy O'Brien3-6, 3-6
W#3 Female DoublesMichelle Daubert / Margaret Foo vs Sandra Couture / Astride Schifano6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-20vs CCR 2Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Dawn Deperrior vs Susan Burt / Lauren Henderson6-3, 7-5
2026-07-13vs TCR: OrtizSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesCarli Rivers / Elizabeth Johnson vs Allison O'Malley / Dawn Gershenfeld7-5, 6-3
L#2 Female DoublesMargaret Foo / Michelle Daubert vs Kris Kohler / Jane Eckhardt3-6, 0-6
2026-07-06Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesCarli Rivers / Dawn Deperrior vs Kimberly Cufari Chin / Leah Gordon6-3, 6-4
2026-06-22vs CCR 1Lost 02
L#1 Female DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Dawn Deperrior vs Alicia Wolk / Grace Williams0-6, 1-6
L#2 Female DoublesSara Ressler / Margaret Foo vs Shannon Cunniffe / Caroline Wilmot4-6, 0-6
2026-06-15vs Midtown: Crandall/RuffoSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesMary-Beth Rumble / Sara Ressler vs Emilie Drumm / Kim Bender6-1, 6-2
L#2 Female DoublesKatie Lennox / Carli Rivers vs Nancy O'Brien / Astride Schifano3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-08vs CCR 2Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesMary-Beth Rumble / Elizabeth Johnson vs Taylor Veenema / Katie Wilmot0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Division II have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Elizabeth Johnson
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Mary-Beth Rumble
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Dawn Deperrior
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Carli Rivers
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #2 Female Doubles 40% · published 3
2.46
Meghan Single
published
Margaret Foo
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published
Sara Ressler
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published
Susan Bartl-Conley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Ressler + Carli Rivers2346% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Deperrior + Elizabeth Johnson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Johnson
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Mary-Beth Rumble
127W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Dawn Deperrior
23W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
3
Carli Rivers
26W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Meghan Single
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
Margaret Foo
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Ressler
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Bartl-Conley
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.