Teams

Different Strokes

2022 Prince Georges Combo · Prince Georges Combo 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.64 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-21vs Net GirlzWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarrie Anderson / Tia Briscoe vs Teri Hudson / Annette Harrington6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesArial Pegues / Cynthia Clinton Brown vs Deborah Thompson / Tracy Walls6-3, 6-2
2022-09-21vs Net GirlzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCynthia Clinton Brown / Tia Briscoe vs Mia Piansay / Andrea Motley6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTammara Peyton / Marsha Williams vs Teri Hudson / Donna Jones7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-09-18vs LoVVWon 10
W#2 DoublesTammara Peyton / Tia Briscoe vs Denise Freeman / Stacey Carey7-5, 6-3
2022-08-21vs Net GirlzLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammara Peyton / Cynthia Clinton Brown vs Mia Piansay / Andrea Motley6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-08-20vs LoVVWon 10
W#1 DoublesArial Pegues / Cynthia Clinton Brown vs Nicole Brizan / Julie Gowin6-2, 6-2
2022-08-16vs Net GirlzWon 10
W#3 DoublesCynthia Clinton Brown / Arial Pegues vs Claris Brock / Layna Kelly1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Arial Pegues
published 4
3.60
Tia Briscoe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Tammara Peyton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Cynthia Clinton Brown
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Carrie Anderson
published 3.5
3.18
Rosalie Hooper
published 3.5
3.16
Marsha Williams
published
3.11
Connie Marable
published 3.5
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
2.68
Venita Cooper
published
Karolyn Clarke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Marable + Cynthia Clinton Brown11754% games+1.1% vs expected
Tia Briscoe + Cynthia Clinton Brown9263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arial Pegues
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Tia Briscoe
286W–132L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Tammara Peyton
37W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Cynthia Clinton Brown
118W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carrie Anderson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Marsha Williams
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Connie Marable
53W–58L career · type S · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Venita Cooper
20W–23L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Karolyn Clarke
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.