Teams

Allison/Taylor/Benton/OC

2026 Combo 18 & Over 2.5, 6.5, 8.5, 10.5 · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming
Sep 23 6:00 PM
Otter Creek Racquet Club
Oct 5 6:00 PM
Otter Creek Racquet Club
Flight standings8 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Junior/Duff/LR/OC000000
2Allison/Taylor/Benton/OC000000
3Murdock/LR/Reb000000
4Glenn/Maumelle/BP000000
5Harkins/LR/CCLR000000
6KMiller/JLaw/LR/PVCC000000
7Dominick/Caple/NLR000000
8Burch/Witherell/LR/Chenal000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Laura Feng
published
Carrie Brown
published 3.5
3.25
Susan Gammill
published
3.22
Autumn Hemphill
published 3.5
2.89
Kisha Boston
published
2.88
Tiffanie Taylor
published
2.88
Lisa Moreland
published
2.86
Melissa Buck
published
2.84
Susan Allison
published
2.76
Brenda Green
published 3
2.70
Leslie Warford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Moreland + Susan Allison10360% games+5.9% vs expected
Susan Allison + Melissa Buck5651% games+3.9% vs expected
Lisa Moreland + Leslie Warford224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Feng
67W–34L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Carrie Brown
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Gammill
34W–45L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Autumn Hemphill
29W–37L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Kisha Boston
25W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
Tiffanie Taylor
17W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Lisa Moreland
27W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Melissa Buck
35W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
Susan Allison
42W–39L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Brenda Green
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
Leslie Warford
34W–20L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.