Teams

OC Dark Horses - iTennis LaHabra - Don Sat 11am

2024 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 7.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

18 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC - 7.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Jermaine Waltemeyer
published
3.68
Lana Dalley
published
3.53
Jonathan Mak
published
3.51
Celeste Torres
published 3.5
3.44
Debbie Carmody
published 3.5
3.41
Marcio Rodrigues
published
3.41
Viviana Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Mel Cabral
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.35
Keiko Jun
published
3.23
Lisabeth Grimm
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.15
AIRI IVES
published 3.5
2.90
Maribeth F Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.89
Joanne Yoshida
published
2.82
Ryan Ona
published 3
2.62
Josephine Chow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Marlon Gavino Villa
published
Mike White
published
Samuel Cardinal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celeste Torres + Mel Cabral7060% games+6.2% vs expected
Lisabeth Grimm + Mike White2746% gamesnot enough data
Lisabeth Grimm + Marlon Gavino Villa404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jermaine Waltemeyer
21W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Lana Dalley
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Jonathan Mak
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Celeste Torres
46W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Debbie Carmody
18W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Marcio Rodrigues
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Viviana Kim
82W–134L career · 2 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Mel Cabral
141W–89L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Keiko Jun
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Lisabeth Grimm
63W–73L career · 8 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
AIRI IVES
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Maribeth F Rodriguez
164W–169L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
Joanne Yoshida
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Ryan Ona
17W–43L career · type S · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Josephine Chow
145W–299L career · 5 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
Marlon Gavino Villa
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike White
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Samuel Cardinal
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.