Teams

DThayaprasat (Park Road)

2026 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM

13 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-17vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Darri Thayaprasat vs Natalie Ivanov / Toni Laney6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Frank vs Callie Schmit4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Gluck / Paula Beecher vs Sunny Bowers / Jessica Mauney3-6, 3-6
2026-05-02vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Brittany Simpson vs Samantha Danesis / Sunny Bowers1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLaine Parker Horvath vs Cassandra Wincek6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Cimmino / Darri Thayaprasat vs Hannah Chillag / Diana West6-1, 6-2
2026-04-25vs DWest (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 DoublesEliza McPherron / Kindell Schmitt vs Carson Rose Tennyson / Karolina Fleming6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCaroline Frank vs Toni Laney6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaula Beecher / Lindsey Stuckey vs Lela Thompson / Diana West6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-18vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesHannah English Rahill / Victoria Chang vs Cassandra Wincek / Hannah Chillag6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesEliza McPherron vs Juliana Marques2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Frank / Laine Parker Horvath vs Natalie Ivanov / Toni Laney1-6, 2-6
2026-04-11vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Victoria Chang vs Karolina Fleming / Jessica Storm3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJane Spading vs Cassandra Wincek1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHannah English Rahill / Caroline Frank vs Toni Laney / Natalie Ivanov4-6, 2-6
2026-04-04vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHannah English Rahill / Brittany Simpson vs Jessica Storm / Carson Rose Tennyson1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesVictoria Chang vs Juliana Marques4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Cimmino / Darri Thayaprasat vs Toni Laney / Jessica Mauney6-2, 6-3
2026-03-28vs DWest (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 DoublesPaula Beecher / Victoria Chang vs Toni Laney / Callie Schmit7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmma Heiderscheit vs Cassandra Wincek6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Kathryn Schafer vs Karolina Fleming / Lela Thompson7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-21vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPaula Beecher / Lindsey Stuckey vs Natalie Ivanov / Toni Laney7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEmma Heiderscheit vs Juliana Marques6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesVictoria Chang / Eliza McPherron vs Samantha Danesis / Carson Rose Tennyson6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2026-03-14vs DWest (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Frank / Kathryn Schafer vs Karolina Fleming / Jessica Storm4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEmma Heiderscheit vs Juliana Marques6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrittany Simpson / Darri Thayaprasat vs Callie Schmit / Cassandra Wincek6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DWest (Park Road)72171024229
2DThayaprasat (Park Road)27101738261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.91
Victoria Chang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.88
Emma Heiderscheit
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.84
Sarah Cimmino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.63
Kindell Schmitt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.51
Caroline Frank
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.42
Darri Thayaprasat
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Brittany Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.25
Hannah English Rahill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Paula Beecher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Laine Parker Horvath
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.10
Eliza McPherron
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jane Spading
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lindsey Stuckey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darri Thayaprasat + Kindell Schmitt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Chang
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.91
Emma Heiderscheit
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.88
Sarah Cimmino
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.84
5
Kindell Schmitt
118W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
4.5
Caroline Frank
22W–7L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
4.51
4.5
Darri Thayaprasat
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Brittany Simpson
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Hannah English Rahill
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
4.25
Paula Beecher
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.22
Laine Parker Horvath
50W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.20
Eliza McPherron
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
4.10
Jane Spading
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Stuckey
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.