Teams

PW.Hulbig

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-08vs TOC.BaddourLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Burkey / Karen Coe vs Kelly Townsend / Vanese Clough4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-17vs TOC.OtsukaWon 10
W#3 DoublesNgoc Hulbig / Patricia Luecke vs Aki Yamatani / Kari Samborski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-10vs MD.DovelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeghan Hammes / Kellie Francis vs Patrice Dovel / Christine Reinke6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNgoc Hulbig / Patricia Luecke vs Kristin Messick / Jami Kim-Rowley4-6, 2-6
2024-06-03vs TING.ThioLost 02
L#2 DoublesDale Martin / Meghan Hammes vs Jannifer Frazier / Shirley Kim1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBriana Hovermale / Patricia Luecke vs Kelly Felten / Victoria Thio4-6, 3-6
2024-05-20vs MCSP.ArneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMeghan Hammes / Kellie Francis vs Laura Weygandt / Wendy Ruffieux2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Burkey / Kristen Kruszewski vs Sharon Fadelici / Araya Coffey6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Joanne Foster
published
3.40
Kellie Francis
published
3.36
Meghan Hammes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Ruthann Gray
published
3.33
Dale Martin
published 3.5
3.25
Sarah Burkey
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.97
Karen Coe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.82
Patricia Luecke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Chase Brady
published 3
Kristen Kruszewski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kellie Francis + Dale Martin3252% games−2.8% vs expected
Karen Coe + Meghan Hammes213 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Hammes + Sarah Burkey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joanne Foster
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Kellie Francis
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Meghan Hammes
131W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Ruthann Gray
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Dale Martin
20W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Sarah Burkey
61W–26L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
3
Karen Coe
54W–91L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Patricia Luecke
81W–71L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Chase Brady
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
Kristen Kruszewski
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.