Teams

Title IXs

2022 Montgomery Combo Mixed Fall · Montgomery Combo Mixed 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Corinne Hart
published 3.5
3.33
Tracy Chen
published 3.5
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.92
David Glasgow
published 3
2.88
Stanley Freeman
published
2.69
Mark Lavoie
published
2.66
Dora Macia
published 3
2.62
Richard McKeon
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Valerie Stoehr
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corinne Hart
17W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Tracy Chen
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
David Glasgow
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Stanley Freeman
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Mark Lavoie
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Dora Macia
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 8 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62
Valerie Stoehr
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.