Teams

Drew (Deering Bay)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Fall Day · 3.0 Adult Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.19 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Blake Drew
published 3.5
3.28
Heather Drstvensek
published 3.5
3.23
Geraldine Blakely
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.12
Marla Ferreira
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Ivory Shevin
published 3
2.98
Kimberly Fenton
published
2.88
Maria Feldman
published
2.85
Cathy Pariser
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Maria Segovia
published
2.75
Joann Feldman
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Maria McDonald
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Sara Klein
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.51
Donna Levine
published 3
2.50
Isabel Fontecilla
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published 3
Cheryl Porter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Pariser + Marla Ferreira271358% games+1.4% vs expected
Maria McDonald + Cathy Pariser202751% games−3.2% vs expected
Isabel Fontecilla + Joann Feldman103146% games−4.6% vs expected
Isabel Fontecilla + Sara Klein111846% games−8.9% vs expected
Isabel Fontecilla + Cathy Pariser6452% gamesnot enough data
Sara Klein + Joann Feldman1941% gamesnot enough data
Sara Klein + Marla Ferreira3454% gamesnot enough data
Maria Feldman + Cathy Pariser3351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blake Drew
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Heather Drstvensek
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3
Geraldine Blakely
134W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.23
3.5
Marla Ferreira
145W–113L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Ivory Shevin
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
Kimberly Fenton
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
Maria Feldman
19W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Cathy Pariser
149W–113L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
Maria Segovia
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.83
Joann Feldman
21W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Maria McDonald
100W–117L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.75
Sara Klein
103W–160L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Donna Levine
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Isabel Fontecilla
89W–168L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Cheryl Porter
32W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.