Teams

West Shore - Hopwood

2023 Central Penn Ladies League · 8.0 Division

15 players · average NTRP 3.79 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2023-02-24vs Wisehaven - MichelsWon 20
W#1 DoublesTeague Wright / Lisa Oommen vs Rachel Allen / Lynne Beck6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSusan Kurtz / Vivian Jugan vs Louise Manzella / Sheryl Stoll6-2, 6-3
2023-02-17vs Hempfield - SwingersWon 21
L#1 DoublesJane Acquilano / Linda Donnelly vs Samantha Laubenstine / Casey Davis0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Lisa Oommen vs Kathleen Schlager / Jennifer Graham6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Strasbaugh / Cindee Trapp vs Cheryl Bogardus / JoAnne Hangen6-2, 6-1
2023-02-10vs Hempfield - GouldWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Acquilano / Linda Donnelly vs Terri Mrozinski / Bonnie Keating4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Ruggiero / Bonnie Bentz vs Amber Kroh / Susan Eurich6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Lisa Oommen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-03vs Hempfield - CovellLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Kurtz / Jane Acquilano vs Lori Tully / Lisa Stokes2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Ruggiero / Teague Wright vs Debora Covell / Patricia Lawrence6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Jacobs / Vivian Jugan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-27vs Hempfield - ForreyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBonnie Bentz / Teague Wright vs Heather Arters / Tia Tedder2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Celia Larsen vs Madhavi Reddy / Cathy Tobin6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMelissa Ruggiero / Mary Strasbaugh vs Jennifer Rakoczy / Catherine Shaak5-7, 2-6
2023-01-20vs Lancaster CC - WoodardWon 21
L#1 DoublesKateri Martin / Jane Acquilano vs Tara Murphy / Heather Spire1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Teague Wright vs Heather Shelton / Kelly Kurtz5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnna Jacobs / Vivian Jugan vs Karen Kuntz / Julia Belser6-4, 6-0
2023-01-13vs Hempfield - ScottLost 12
W#1 DoublesJane Acquilano / Susan Kurtz vs Dale Heird / Brenda Horst6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBonnie Bentz / Carolyn Hopwood vs Nina Beecher / Kara Fisher4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary Strasbaugh / Teague Wright vs Joanne Hess / Deborah Rittase6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-12-02vs Hempfield - CovellLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Lisa Oommen vs Karen Schaufert / Michele Mccartney3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Ruggiero / Bonnie Bentz vs Lisa Stokes / Shannon Corcoran5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTeague Wright / Mary Strasbaugh vs Patricia Lawrence / Lori Tully6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-11-12vs Hempfield - ForreyLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Kurtz / Jane Acquilano vs Heather Arters / Iris Lehman6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Ruggiero / Cindee Trapp vs Jennifer Rakoczy / Carol Dimm6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Teague Wright vs Cathy Tobin / Madhavi Reddy5-7, 6-7
2022-11-02vs Lancaster CC - WoodardLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Ruggiero / Teague Wright vs Suzanne Woodard / Sarah Kline4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Mary Strasbaugh vs Jill Frey / Kelly Kurtz0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCelia Larsen / Kateri Martin vs Rosana Mann / Heather Shelton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-28vs Hempfield - ScottLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Frick / Jane Acquilano vs Lori Hunt / Dale Heird6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeague Wright / Bonnie Bentz vs Brenda Horst / Joanne Hess3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVivian Jugan / Natalie Grubb vs Deborah Rittase / Phyllis Bouder6-7, 5-7
2022-10-12vs Hempfield - GouldWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Lisa Oommen vs Teresa Clark / Madonna Hufnagel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKateri Martin / Melissa Ruggiero vs Judy Bahney / Margaret Beaver6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVivian Jugan / Mary Strasbaugh vs Pat Giles / Stacy Gould5-7, 4-6
2022-10-07vs Wisehaven - MichelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Frick / Jane Acquilano vs Darlene Ashwood / Louise Manzella6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Hopwood / Melissa Ruggiero vs Laura Lanza / Paula Huntzinger6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVivian Jugan / Natalie Grubb vs Lynne Beck / Janet Krusen6-3, 6-3
2022-09-30vs Hempfield - SwingersWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Kurtz / Jane Acquilano vs Kathleen Schlager / Tara Marshall6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBonnie Bentz / Lisa Oommen vs Mridula Mishra / Elizabeth O'Donnell6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKateri Martin / Celia Larsen vs Kristin Jeffries / JoAnne Hangen2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jane Acquilano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Natalie Grubb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Cindee Trapp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Linda Donnelly
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.67
Teague Wright
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
3.66
Carolyn Hopwood
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.55
Bonnie Bentz
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.55
Kateri Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Celia Larsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Anna Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Vivian Jugan
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
Lisa Frick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Oommen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Strasbaugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Melissa Ruggiero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kateri Martin + Teague Wright15261% games+5.1% vs expected
Melissa Ruggiero + Teague Wright6256% games+3.2% vs expected
Cindee Trapp + Teague Wright6450% games+1.0% vs expected
Carolyn Hopwood + Celia Larsen3252% games+0.9% vs expected
Natalie Grubb + Teague Wright4249% games+0.3% vs expected
Kateri Martin + Celia Larsen161552% games−0.7% vs expected
Carolyn Hopwood + Linda Donnelly5454% games−2.0% vs expected
Vivian Jugan + Mary Strasbaugh5647% games−2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jane Acquilano
134W–97L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
Natalie Grubb
78W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Cindee Trapp
115W–100L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
Linda Donnelly
240W–101L career · 9 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Teague Wright
175W–128L career · 22 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Carolyn Hopwood
140W–156L career · 13 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Bonnie Bentz
38W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kateri Martin
118W–125L career · 4 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Celia Larsen
61W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Anna Jacobs
106W–100L career · 1 line in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Vivian Jugan
155W–154L career · 22 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Lisa Frick
79W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Oommen
23W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Strasbaugh
39W–55L career · 14 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Ruggiero
50W–29L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.