Teams

7 CCV Bennett

2023 Richmond Combo Weekday · Richmond Combo Weekday 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-24vs 8 Hermitage Lines LadiesLost 01
L#2 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Anne Robertson Starke vs Teki Hall / Kristy Bauer6-7, 3-6
2023-08-03vs 5 Burkwood MatthewsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristin Mullins / Kerry DeLacey vs Jennifer Hughes / Melissa Allen6-4, 7-6
2023-07-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKerry DeLacey / Megan Marriott vs Angela Woods / Stephanie Marcus6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekday 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kerry DeLacey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Laurel Wise
published
3.67
Hyde Loupassi
published 4
3.61
Mary Bartzen
published
3.58
Tara Bennett
published
3.34
Stephanie Parker
published
3.33
Kristin Mullins
published
3.25
Windy Campbell
published
3.17
Shula Good
published
3.11
Megan Marriott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Parker + Kerry DeLacey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kerry DeLacey
143W–100L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Laurel Wise
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Hyde Loupassi
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Mary Bartzen
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.61
Tara Bennett
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Stephanie Parker
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.34
Kristin Mullins
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Windy Campbell
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Shula Good
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Anne Robertson Starke
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Megan Marriott
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.