Teams

Coins, Jimmie

2026 Combo 40 & Over-JXN · Men 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-24vs Merchant, TomWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Linzey / Yongfeng Zhao vs Stanley Jenkins / Louis Saddler6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStanley Rattler / Joseph McCray vs Phillip Pace / Philip Cothern2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-17vs Walters, EricWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Ellis / Joseph McCray vs Russell Young / Jerry Sloan7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStanley Rattler / Larry Christian vs Randy Lominick / Bruce Case7-5, 6-1
2026-08-11vs Smith, NathanWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoseph McCray / William Ellis vs Mark Fisher / Kevin Rundlett6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Christian / Derrick Burt vs Matthew Reece / Donald Baron5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Thomas / Stanley Rattler vs Nathan Smith / Michael Parker4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-03vs Brown, PatrickWon 30
W#1 DoublesDerrick Burt / Derrick Jones vs William Lee / Jim Davis6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStanley Rattler / MICHAEL ANDREWS vs Jitendra Sahoo / Carlas Davis6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAquilino Escaner / Larry Christian vs Jay Lake / Michael Lang4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Men 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smith, Ashley2042430
2Walters, Lydia1021330
3Powers, Catherine1133647
4Coins, Jimmie0103637
5Prince, Terri02241069

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
David Linzey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
William Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Joseph McCray
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Stanley Rattler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Larry Christian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Derrick Burt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Aquilino Escaner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.77
Derrick Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
MICHAEL ANDREWS
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derrick Burt + David Linzey224 matchesnot enough data
Joseph McCray + William Ellis213 matchesnot enough data
Joseph McCray + Derrick Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Stanley Rattler + Larry Christian213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Linzey
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
William Ellis
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Joseph McCray
37W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Stanley Rattler
33W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Larry Christian
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Derrick Burt
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Aquilino Escaner
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Derrick Jones
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
MICHAEL ANDREWS
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.