Teams

DWest (Queens)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 9.5 Women - Mon PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-13vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesCallie Schmit / Natalie Ivanov vs Hannah English Rahill / Sanjana Sudhir6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Toni Laney vs Caroline Frank / Laine Parker Horvath7-5, 6-2
2025-10-11vs JVarn (Palisades)Won 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Ivanov / Toni Laney vs Tanya Hecht / Cecilia Drake6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMeredith Propeck / Samantha Danesis vs MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Lina Clarke7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana West / Kindell Schmitt vs Jordan Bowers / Jessica Varn7-6, 7-6
2025-09-22vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Sunny Bowers vs Sanjana Sudhir / Hannah English Rahill4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesToni Laney / Callie Schmit vs Brittany Hill / Cassandra Wincek6-3, 7-6
2025-09-08vs JVarn (Palisades)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKindell Schmitt / Diana West vs Lina Clarke / Tanya Hecht6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Reich / Perri Freel vs Jordan Bowers / Jessica Varn7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHannah Chillag / Toni Laney vs Cecilia Drake / Lindsay Morrison6-0, 6-1
2025-09-01vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Perri Freel vs Hannah English Rahill / Sanjana Sudhir6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesToni Laney / Callie Schmit vs Darri Thayaprasat / Cassandra Wincek6-4, 6-3
2025-08-18vs JVarn (Palisades)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMeghan Bartholomew / Samantha Danesis vs MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Cecilia Drake6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNatalie Ivanov / Callie Schmit vs Tanya Hecht / Lindsay Morrison6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 9.5 Women - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Natalie Ivanov
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.63
Kindell Schmitt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.59
Meghan Bartholomew
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.58
Toni Laney
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.58
Callie Schmit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.56
Samantha Danesis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.48
Perri Freel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.45
Sunny Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Diana West
published 4.5
4.19
Hannah Chillag
published
3.92
Mary Holland
published
Lela Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Bartholomew + Samantha Danesis14658% games+7.7% vs expected
Natalie Ivanov + Samantha Danesis8355% games+2.9% vs expected
Natalie Ivanov + Toni Laney13357% games+2.4% vs expected
Natalie Ivanov + Callie Schmit6162% games−0.1% vs expected
Callie Schmit + Toni Laney4156% gamesnot enough data
Sunny Bowers + Samantha Danesis224 matchesnot enough data
Toni Laney + Samantha Danesis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Natalie Ivanov
38W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.65
5
Kindell Schmitt
118W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.63
5
Meghan Bartholomew
66W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.59
4.5
Toni Laney
172W–51L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.58
5
Callie Schmit
60W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.58
5
Samantha Danesis
110W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.56
Perri Freel
67W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
4.48
Sunny Bowers
50W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.45
4.5
Diana West
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Hannah Chillag
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
4.19
Mary Holland
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.92
Lela Thompson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.