Teams

LTC-D YELLOW

2026 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-06vs MVCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBonita Thistle / Jo Johnson vs Julie Levey / Beth Eiseman0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTerri Jenney / Mary Johanson vs Karin Olson Hoal / Lisa Kutner6-3, 6-2
2026-07-30vs KC-RH ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesTerri Jenney / Mary Johanson vs Lori Moinet / Laurie Ross4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJo Johnson / Bonita Thistle vs Trish Miller / Judy Greco7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBetsy Duryea / Karen Hyde vs Kathleen Wilhite / Joyce Anderson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-23vs LEBTC PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesBonita Thistle / Terri Jenney vs Joyce Naylon / Nancy Quayle4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChris Romer / Karen Brennan vs Cinda Nab / Margie Walsh2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Hyde / Karen Kirby vs Carol Avery / Becky Glenn0-6, 0-6
2026-07-16vs LTC-M TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesBonita Thistle / Chris Romer vs Lauren Gardiner / Pamela Schmidt6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Johanson / Karen Brennan vs Barbara Nevins / Christie Bibeau1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Hyde / Betsy Duryea vs Linda Wagner / Leslie Hauschildt4-6, 2-6
2026-07-09vs MC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesLiz Hafer / Terri Jenney vs Karen Bent / Teri Harrington6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Brennan / Jo Johnson vs Sandra Gilbert / Shirley Naranjo6-0, 6-1
2026-07-02vs CK PURPLELost 12
W#1 DoublesLiz Hafer / Bonita Thistle vs JANI HERCHER / Debra Frye6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Kirby / Betsy Duryea vs Kathryn Dann / Ellen McClurkin3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Brennan / Kelly Costanzo vs Sandy Reed / Karen Bebber4-6, 5-7
2026-06-30vs BCST REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesBonita Thistle / Terri Jenney vs Mary Mucilli / Maryann Barwick4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJo Johnson / Chris Romer vs Judith Wallach / Beth Leon6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Hyde / Tia Heneghan vs Kathleen Antony / Sharon Ehler6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CACM PURPLE6116516146
2LTC-M TEAL5215615130
3PRKR YELLOW5214718177
4CK PURPLE52111020167
5LTC-D YELLOW3491228208
6BM PINK2581329206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Chris Romer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Terri Jenney
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.74
Judith McKinney
published
2.71
Bonita Thistle
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.62
Mary Johanson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Tia Heneghan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Karen Brennan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.43
Betsy Duryea
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.27
Karen Kirby
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Kelly Costanzo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jo Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 89%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published
Karen Hyde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Liz Hafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonita Thistle + Terri Jenney5650% gamesnot enough data
Mary Johanson + Terri Jenney6166% gamesnot enough data
Judith McKinney + Terri Jenney4164% gamesnot enough data
Jo Johnson + Bonita Thistle134 matchesnot enough data
Jo Johnson + Terri Jenney404 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Costanzo + Karen Brennan134 matchesnot enough data
Chris Romer + Bonita Thistle213 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Duryea + Terri Jenney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Romer
24W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Terri Jenney
110W–65L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Judith McKinney
15W–12L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Bonita Thistle
103W–120L career · 10 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Mary Johanson
37W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
3
Tia Heneghan
29W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Karen Brennan
5W–36L career · 7 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Betsy Duryea
35W–36L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.43
Karen Kirby
8W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.27
Kelly Costanzo
4W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.27
Jo Johnson
11W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Hyde
6W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Liz Hafer
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.