Teams

El.Speicher18C

2026 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 9.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-30vs Ma.Jackson18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Alvarez / Kamila Korzeniowska vs Kelly Moler Glass / Jennifer Reese2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Fernandez-Pita / Allison Johnson vs MacY Fisher / Leslie Boesch4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAline Laborde / Tanya Smith vs Heather Remley / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade6-1, 6-4
2026-08-16vs Da.Wilder18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaula Fernandez-Pita / Tanya Parise vs Jennifer McEntee / Shelly Kirkpatrick6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAline Laborde / Elizabeth Speicher vs Anastasiya Manet / Erin Rankin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKamila Korzeniowska / Laura Alvarez vs Alex Gormley / Charlie Trinco6-3, 6-1
2026-08-09vs Ma.Jackson18CLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Alvarez / Allison Johnson vs Leslie Boesch / Jennifer Hiller2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnna Tomkins / Madeline Finley vs Tiffany Holbrook / Tanita Tedamrongwanish3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTanya Parise / Elizabeth Speicher vs Jennifer Reese / Elizabeth Hodges3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 9.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ma.Jackson18C2042447
2Da.Wilder18C1142658
3El.Speicher18C1133754
4Al.Stubbs18C02151062

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Laura Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.66
Paula Fernandez-Pita
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.64
Elizabeth Speicher
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.59
Aline Laborde
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Tanya Parise
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.30
Madeline Finley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Kamila Korzeniowska
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Anna Tomkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Felita Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Fernandez-Pita + Aline Laborde4552% games−3.1% vs expected
Laura Alvarez + Kamila Korzeniowska123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Alvarez
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.71
5
Paula Fernandez-Pita
148W–60L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.66
5
Elizabeth Speicher
13W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
4.64
4.5
Aline Laborde
71W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
4.59
4.5
Tanya Parise
97W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.38
Madeline Finley
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
4.30
Kamila Korzeniowska
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Felita Clark
125W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.