Teams

IA/Wilkinson/55&Over7.0W

2022 IA 55 & Over Adult League · 7.0 W 55 Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-15vs Olafson/ThomasWon 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Studer / Jane Terry vs Danita Olafson / Beth Eganhouse6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanice Koder / Karen Mann vs Cheryl Minor / Pamela Billerbeck6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJosephine Jannes / Sandi Christopherson vs Michele Staub / Wanda Lienemann6-1, 6-1
2022-03-27vs SueppelWon 20
W#1 DoublesJane Terry / Rebecca Studer vs Ria Meyer / Karen Casavant6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJune MacKay / Josephine Jannes vs Kelly Drake / Patricia Conrad6-3, 6-3
2022-03-06vs IAWC/Thompson-Oster/55&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Sedgley / Lubertha McClairen vs Ann Knierim / Faye Williams2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Cordes / Sandi Christopherson vs Nancy Almasi / Shari Konarske3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLee Johnson / Sheree Menadue vs Caren Wasta / Cheryl Patten6-2, 7-6
2021-10-24vs Olafson/ThomasWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Studer / Jane Terry vs Danita Olafson / Beth Eganhouse6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJoan Meek / Luz Dealba vs Kim Stewart / Michele Staub5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLubertha McClairen / Barbara Sedgley vs Julie Kinsella / Pamela Billerbeck6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-10vs IAWC/Thompson-Oster/55&Over7.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanice Koder / Karen Mann vs Faye Williams / Karen Thinnes1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDana McBratney / Karen Cordes vs Carrie Corbett / Maureen Engle6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJune MacKay / Lee Johnson vs Jackie Thompson-Oster / Shari Konarske7-5, 6-1
2021-10-03vs SueppelWon 30
W#1 DoublesDana McBratney / Karen Cordes vs Tracy Speraw / Patricia Conrad4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSheree Menadue / Lee Johnson vs Kathryn Duethman / Ria Meyer6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSharon Wilkinson / Joan Meek vs Kelly Drake / Laura Graham6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 W 55 Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Wilkinson/55&Over7.0W5114411127
2IAWC/Thompson-Oster/55&Over7.0W4211717142
3Sueppel2441428185
4Olafson/Thomas1571123174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Rebecca Studer
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published
3.45
Joan Meek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Karen Mann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Jane Terry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Dana McBratney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.89
Barbara Sedgley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Janice Koder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Josephine Jannes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
June MacKay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Cordes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lee Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lubertha McClairen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Penee Indelicato
published
Sharon Wilkinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sheree Menadue
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana McBratney + June MacKay0525% games−14.1% vs expected
Dana McBratney + Karen Cordes314 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Wilkinson + Janice Koder213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Cordes + Janice Koder123 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Sedgley + Lubertha McClairen213 matchesnot enough data
Lee Johnson + Sheree Menadue213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Studer + Jane Terry303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Studer
78W–59L career · 11 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Joan Meek
32W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
Karen Mann
18W–15L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Jane Terry
20W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Dana McBratney
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Barbara Sedgley
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
Janice Koder
29W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Josephine Jannes
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
June MacKay
12W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Cordes
5W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lee Johnson
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lubertha McClairen
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Penee Indelicato
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon Wilkinson
6W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sheree Menadue
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.