Teams

Monroe - Tootsie Pops

2026 Howard Adult 65 & Over · Howard Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.15 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-14vs Leitzer-Kerr - Forever YoungLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Chrisco Andrews / Elizabeth Goldy vs Millicent Audain / Daphne Fuller4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Friedman / Nancy Brown vs Emily Frank / Sharon Tennyson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRosemary Prola / Leslie MacFarlane vs Leanne Paranik / Linda Deanto1-6, 1-6
2026-07-10vs CareySplit 11
W#1 DoublesNancy Brown / Corlyn Krinsky vs Deborah Dettmer / Susan Baxter6-7, 5-1
L#2 DoublesSandy Friedman / Leslie MacFarlane vs Nancy Carey / Therese Erdman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-06vs Leitzer-Kerr - Forever YoungLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Chrisco Andrews / Nancy Brown vs Daphne Fuller / Millicent Audain0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Spano / Leslie MacFarlane vs Terri Mrozinski / Teresa Adams1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBronwen Williams / Sandy Friedman vs Thelma Leitzer-Kerr / Linda Deanto1-6, 2-6
2026-06-26vs CareyLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Goldy / Bronwen Williams vs Deborah Dettmer / Valerie Mockapetris4-6, 4-4
L#2 DoublesRosemary Prola / Leslie MacFarlane vs Susan Groman / Michele Jordan6-7, 5-6
2026-06-15vs CareyWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Goldy / Karen Spano vs Susan Groman / Marie Kerins6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Chrisco Andrews / Nancy Brown vs Therese Erdman / Debby Moulding6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesArianne Monroe / Faye Meyers vs Michele Jordan / Deborah Dettmer2-6, 1-6
2026-06-09vs Leitzer-Kerr - Forever YoungLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Goldy / Julie Chrisco Andrews vs Sharon Tennyson / Linda Deanto6-4, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKaren Spano / Leslie MacFarlane vs Daphne Fuller / Millicent Audain0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRosemary Prola / Nancy Brown vs Joy Kirk / Terri Mrozinski1-6, 4-6
2026-06-01vs CareyLost 03
L#1 DoublesRosemary Prola / Elizabeth Goldy vs Susan Baxter / Marie Kerins1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Spano / Faye Meyers vs Pamela Leffler / Jean Flack3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Brown / Susan Houck vs Michele Jordan / Susan Groman2-6, 4-6
2026-05-27vs Leitzer-Kerr - Forever YoungLost 02
L#1 DoublesCorlyn Krinsky / Elizabeth Goldy vs Emily Frank / Sharon Tennyson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFaye Meyers / Nancy Brown vs Leanne Paranik / Linda Deanto0-6, 1-6
2026-05-15vs CareyLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Goldy / Arianne Monroe vs Pamela Leffler / Valerie Mockapetris1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Friedman / Leslie MacFarlane vs Susan Baxter / Marie Kerins3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBronwen Williams / Susan Houck vs Debby Moulding / Nancy Carey1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-11vs Leitzer-Kerr - Forever YoungLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Goldy / Arianne Monroe vs Linda Deanto / Leanne Paranik1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesNancy Brown / Sandy Friedman vs Thelma Leitzer-Kerr / Daphne Fuller5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLeslie MacFarlane / Susan Houck vs Joy Kirk / Joan White-McCain2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Howard Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Leitzer-Kerr - Forever Young1002737164
2Carey46141635273
3Monroe - Tootsie Pops1942654347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Corlyn Krinsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Elizabeth Goldy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Lynn Daggett
published 3.5
3.04
Sandy Friedman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Julie Chrisco Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Karen Spano
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Bronwen Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Arianne Monroe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Leslie MacFarlane
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.63
Susan Houck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Faye Meyers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Rosemary Prola
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Michele Barron
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corlyn Krinsky
79W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Elizabeth Goldy
124W–115L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Lynn Daggett
46W–64L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Sandy Friedman
5W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.04
3
Julie Chrisco Andrews
155W–97L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Karen Spano
88W–120L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Bronwen Williams
109W–99L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Arianne Monroe
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Leslie MacFarlane
10W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Susan Houck
60W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Faye Meyers
33W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Rosemary Prola
44W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Michele Barron
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.