Teams

GF: Spin Doctors: Stoian/Hall

2026 ECT Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men Flt 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.79 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesAndrew Bowler / Kevin Sullivan vs Lee Howard / Matthew Goldreich2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPhilip Goetz vs Albert Kirwan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAustin Greenfield / Ryan Finnegan vs John Fuller / Gregory Jewett3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesPhilip Goetz / Lutz Braum vs Christopher Andrew / Gregory Jewett5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndrew Evans vs Ryan Balavender3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCHRISTIAN CORMIER / Philip Dinauer vs Dennis Aspesi / Matthew Goldreich1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMihai Alex Stoian / Christopher Milligan vs Lee Howard / Albert Kirwan6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-05-03vs OSB: Sobolewski/PetersonWon 31
W#1 DoublesPhilip Goetz / Philip Dinauer vs Aaron Silver / Rob Carron7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAndrew Evans vs Andrew Randak6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLutz Braum / Gilles Marchand vs Christopher Garvey / John M Dusza6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Bowler / Samuel Haydock vs Paul Sobolewski / Robert Fiocco3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-19vs OSB: Sobolewski/PetersonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGilles Marchand / Philip Dinauer vs Scott Dunn / Craig Cooke7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesPhilip Goetz vs Robert Noack1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Sullivan / Christopher Milligan vs John Gannon / David Miles3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKameron Shahid / Andrew Bowler vs John M Dusza / David Peterson6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesPhilip Goetz / Philip Dinauer vs Agnish Mukhopadhyay / Dennis Aspesi7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrew Evans vs Christopher Andrew6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGilles Marchand / Kameron Shahid vs John Fuller / Albert Kirwan6-3, 6-4
2026-03-01vs OSB: Sobolewski/PetersonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhilip Dinauer / CHRISTIAN CORMIER vs Scott Dunn / Rob Carron6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRyan Finnegan / Gregory Woodward vs Craig Cooke / Ben Citrin1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GF: Spin Doctors: Stoian/Hall0615921196
2OSB: Sobolewski/Peterson06121228217
3LS: Shoreline Smashers: Kirwin/Mukhopadhyay0691531231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Gilles Marchand
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Lutz Braum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Andrew Evans
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.77
Philip Goetz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Christopher Milligan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Gregory Woodward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Philip Dinauer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.63
Mihai Alex Stoian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Andrew Bowler
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Kameron Shahid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.33
CHRISTIAN CORMIER
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Austin Greenfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.07
Ryan Finnegan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kevin Sullivan
published
Samuel Haydock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vivek Parwani
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Goetz + Philip Dinauer16358% games+5.2% vs expected
Philip Dinauer + Gilles Marchand5260% games+1.8% vs expected
Philip Goetz + Lutz Braum2349% games−9.3% vs expected
Lutz Braum + Philip Dinauer123 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Sullivan + Andrew Bowler303 matchesnot enough data
Kameron Shahid + Andrew Bowler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gilles Marchand
55W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.03
Lutz Braum
15W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Andrew Evans
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
Philip Goetz
50W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christopher Milligan
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Gregory Woodward
1W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Philip Dinauer
65W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Mihai Alex Stoian
78W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.63
3.5
Andrew Bowler
50W–44L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
Kameron Shahid
14W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
CHRISTIAN CORMIER
28W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Austin Greenfield
33W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Ryan Finnegan
7W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kevin Sullivan
24W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Samuel Haydock
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Vivek Parwani
14W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.