Teams

Pinellas - Countryside/Wehner

2021 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-13vs Seminole Lake Smash GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesNelci Rodrigues / Melissa Voelker vs Gina Morgan / Dori Hazama6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-03-13vs ELW AnkneyLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrandy Mickey vs Sibila Harja6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-02-20vs Bardmoor GrossLost 01
L#2 DoublesNelci Rodrigues / Brandy Mickey vs Kim Blackmore / Deirdre West2-6, 2-6
2021-02-06vs ELW AnkneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCassandra Remedios / Nelci Rodrigues vs Debra Burwell / Teresa Orr6-0, 6-4
2021-01-30vs Seminole Lake CokeWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoann Suyao / Nelci Rodrigues vs Erin Vickers / Kim Williams6-2, 6-4
2021-01-23vs Seminole Lake Smash GirlsLost 01
L#1 SinglesBrandy Mickey vs Jennifer Botelho6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2021-01-16vs Bardmoor GrossSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCassandra Remedios / Nelci Rodrigues vs Nancy Harper / Cindy Ferguson6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Voelker / Brandy Mickey vs Irene Nasworthy / Deirdre West1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kelly Armagost
published
3.66
Joann Suyao
published
3.62
Michelle Meyer
published
3.57
Brandy Mickey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.51
Melissa Voelker
published
3.37
Nelci Rodrigues
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Karen Braudis
published 3.5
Chary Acevedo
published 3.5
3.06
Maresol Wehner
published
2.94
Lisa Lowe
published
2.83
Daspina Malasky
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nelci Rodrigues + Brandy Mickey314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
Joann Suyao
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
Michelle Meyer
7W–18L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Brandy Mickey
77W–49L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.57
Melissa Voelker
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Nelci Rodrigues
201W–129L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Karen Braudis
36W–23L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Chary Acevedo
7W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maresol Wehner
11W–8L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lisa Lowe
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Daspina Malasky
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.