Teams

Ardea Hueholt

2025 Pinellas Combo 18 & Over Weekend Summer · 6.5 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-06vs Innisbrook HidalgoLost 01
L#3 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Lee Cucchi vs Christie Rock / Carol Bou-sliman1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-23vs Seminole Lake Dsa 6.5 WLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacey Castellini / Christine Hueholt vs Nicki Chong / Jessica Kuzio3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAna Jara / Cathy Garcia vs Tiffany Hashem / Eileen Rodriguez2-6, 4-6
2025-08-16vs Seminole Lakes PriceWon 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Stacey Castellini vs Maggie Berning / Erica Allums7-5, 6-3
2025-08-09vs SPTC Holliday 6.5 WWon 20
W#2 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Ana Jara vs Zilya Ruga / Petra Jessen6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLee Cucchi / Noela Fries vs Christine Marascio / Isabelle Conti6-4, 6-2
2025-07-26vs Innisbrook HidalgoLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Lee Cucchi vs Sue Francis / Lisa DeGoes3-6, 2-6
2025-07-19vs Seminole Lake Dsa 6.5 WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStacey Castellini / Amy Hill vs Tiffany Hashem / Eileen Rodriguez1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAna Jara / Kimberly Ankney vs Joanne O Ryan / Hong Liu6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-12vs Seminole Lakes PriceLost 12
W#1 DoublesNoela Fries / Lee Cucchi vs Christine Price / Asheley Wardell1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobyn Houston / Martha Cornatzer vs Paula Eurich / Sally Blush4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Ankney / Noella Burgeson vs Beverly Bozarth / Shelley Williams4-6, 6-7
2025-06-28vs SPTC Holliday 6.5 WLost 01
L#2 DoublesStacey Castellini / Cathy Garcia vs Katherine Oliveira / Petra Jessen3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Amy Burns
published 3.5
3.07
Noella Burgeson
published
3.06
Martha Cornatzer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Ana Jara
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Stacey Castellini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Noela Fries
published
2.85
Robyn Houston
published
2.73
Lee Cucchi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
2.57
Kimberly Ankney
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Cathy Garcia
published 3
Gail Stallwood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Houston + Lee Cucchi7556% games−1.4% vs expected
Ana Jara + Kimberly Ankney4545% games−9.7% vs expected
Stacey Castellini + Martha Cornatzer51941% gamesnot enough data
Ana Jara + Martha Cornatzer3546% gamesnot enough data
Lee Cucchi + Kimberly Ankney2644% gamesnot enough data
Lee Cucchi + Martha Cornatzer4355% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Ankney + Martha Cornatzer4256% gamesnot enough data
Ana Jara + Noella Burgeson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Burns
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Noella Burgeson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Martha Cornatzer
117W–130L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Ana Jara
47W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Stacey Castellini
23W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Noela Fries
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Robyn Houston
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Lee Cucchi
53W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Christine Hueholt
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Kimberly Ankney
76W–159L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Cathy Garcia
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Gail Stallwood
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.