Teams

Linden 40+ 6.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-06vs Shigo_Dulin - 40+ 6.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Flaherty / Gina Carrick vs Christa Wykoff / Melissa Gujrati2-6, 1-6
2022-09-22vs Harding 40+ 6.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenuka Shivaji / Jennifer Flaherty vs Spoma Jovanovic / Betty Kress4-6, 6-6
2022-09-19vs Pressley - 40+ 6.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Linden / Jennifer Flaherty vs Lara Heberle / Angela Payseur6-2, 6-2
2022-09-08vs Hughes/Hooper 40+ 6.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Flaherty / Sheila Schmedes vs Lauren Haldeman / Julie McPherson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-01vs Propst/Nadel - 40+ 6.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Flaherty / Samantha Stichter vs Jill Elam / Myra Propst0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-08-25vs Manning - 40+ 6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Flaherty / Robin Pierson vs Trisha Kirby / Samantha Price3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-08-18vs Davis/Schulenklopper 40+ 6.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Flaherty / Karen D Smith vs Jennifer Tewksbury / Jennifer Yates0-6, 2-6
2022-08-11vs Miller 40+ 6.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Flaherty / Renuka Shivaji vs Donna Keel / Angela Kerr6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gina Carrick
published 3.5
3.07
Donna Esson
published 3.5
3.06
Jennifer Flaherty
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Sheila Schmedes
published
2.99
Maria Linden
published
2.92
Suzanne Andia
published
2.90
Samantha Stichter
published
2.85
Laura Otterberg
published
2.69
Sandra Selley
published
2.60
Renuka Shivaji
published
Karen D Smith
published
Robin Pierson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Andia + Jennifer Flaherty044 matchesnot enough data
Donna Esson + Renuka Shivaji033 matchesnot enough data
Laura Otterberg + Samantha Stichter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gina Carrick
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Donna Esson
10W–29L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Jennifer Flaherty
46W–45L career · 8 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Sheila Schmedes
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Maria Linden
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
2.99
Suzanne Andia
23W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Samantha Stichter
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
Laura Otterberg
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Sandra Selley
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Renuka Shivaji
8W–20L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
2.60
Karen D Smith
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Pierson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.