Teams

Flint River/Paige Saunders

2024 Bainbridge Southern Combo 40 & Over - Fall · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-08-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaige Saunders / Rhonda Tullos vs Allyson Delius / Anna Lee8-9
2024-08-22vs ThomasvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElaine Rudd / Kim Thriffiley vs Amanda Fisher / Anna Lee6-8
W#2 DoublesPaige Saunders / Rhonda Tullos vs Lynn Andersen / Holly Harrison8-4
2024-08-22vs ThomasvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesSherry Cady / Jennifer Kjellerup vs Anna Lee / Amanda Fisher2-8
W#2 DoublesRhonda Tullos / Paige Saunders vs Holly Harrison / Lynn Andersen8-4
W#3 DoublesGina Herring / Katrina Walton vs Allyson Delius / Jessica Huffman1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Jennifer Kjellerup
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Rhonda Tullos
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Tricia Szwarc
published
3.50
Kim Thriffiley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Sherry Cady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Paige Saunders
published
3.35
Joan Bassett
published
3.33
Elaine Rudd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Carson Parker
published 3.5
3.21
Gina Herring
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Tullos + Gina Herring122545% games+7.1% vs expected
Rhonda Tullos + Sherry Cady13855% games+4.9% vs expected
Jennifer Kjellerup + Rhonda Tullos241255% games+4.6% vs expected
Elaine Rudd + Rhonda Tullos181448% games+3.1% vs expected
Elaine Rudd + Kim Thriffiley192748% games+0.2% vs expected
Jennifer Kjellerup + Sherry Cady13551% games−1.4% vs expected
Kim Thriffiley + Gina Herring41642% gamesnot enough data
Kim Thriffiley + Rhonda Tullos31437% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Kjellerup
143W–105L career · 1 line in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Rhonda Tullos
237W–248L career · 5 lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.59
Tricia Szwarc
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
Kim Thriffiley
144W–202L career · 3 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Sherry Cady
196W–173L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Paige Saunders
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
Joan Bassett
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.35
Elaine Rudd
185W–162L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Carson Parker
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Gina Herring
212W–283L career · 1 line in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.