Teams

ETC:Maynard

2025 WMA Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-17vs ETC:Summer Fling: Kucejko/WyzgaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAshley Lewis / Martha Lopez vs Robyn Sondak / Stephanie O'Leary6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCheryl Wilson Maynard vs ALYCE STILES0-6
2025-07-10vs ETC:BennettLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Wilson Maynard / Mary Tudryn vs Mika Inoue / Margaret Rakas1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAshley Lewis vs Kristen Dygon5-7, 5-7
2025-06-19vs ETC:Summer Fling: Kucejko/WyzgaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Tudryn / Cheryl Wilson Maynard vs Laurie Fede / Beverly Paige6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAshley Lewis vs ALYCE STILES4-6, 6-2, 3-4
2025-06-12vs ETC:BennettWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Tudryn / Martha Lopez vs Aimee Leventis / Kristen Dygon6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAshley Lewis vs Allison Cheney6-2, 6-3
2025-06-05vs ETC:Summer Fling: Kucejko/WyzgaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMartha Lopez / Mary Tudryn vs Nancy Wyzga / Susan Goldsmith6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAshley Lewis vs Robyn Sondak6-3, 6-0
2025-06-02vs ETC:BennettSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaryll Sverrisson / Cheryl Wilson Maynard vs Margaret Rakas / Kristen Dygon2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAshley Lewis vs Anne Wheeler6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Bennett4211715142
2ETC:Summer Fling: Kucejko/Wyzga339920148
3ETC:Maynard2471122163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Ashley Lewis
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.91
Mary Tudryn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Daryll Sverrisson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Martha Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Cheryl Wilson Maynard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.44
Michelle Szlajen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Tudryn + Martha Lopez314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Lewis
22W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.10
Mary Tudryn
60W–82L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Daryll Sverrisson
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Martha Lopez
29W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Cheryl Wilson Maynard
48W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Michelle Szlajen
30W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.