Teams

Sports Mall-Jones

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 8.0M

14 players · average NTRP 3.92 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-23vs Utah/Taylor/55&O/8.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Payne / Steven Payne vs Ricardo Quiros / Paul Dunford1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Black / TROY GRANGER vs M Vinson Miner / Brent Barber1-6, 1-6
2025-07-16vs Liberty Park-Bird BudsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSteven Hutchinson / Jack Andrews vs Steve Atkin / Dennis Bird3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMartez Banks / Derek Ollivier vs Rick Hagen / Spero Musuris6-3, 7-5
2025-07-02vs Utah/Taylor/55&O/8.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSteven Hutchinson / Derek Ollivier vs M Vinson Miner / Kerry Perez4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJames Payne / Steven Payne vs Merlin Carpenter / Keith Gwilliam7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-06-25vs Liberty Park-Bird BudsWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim Otto / Steven Hutchinson vs Gopal Chemiti / Craig Hendrix6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Black / Brad Gause vs Steve Atkin / Phillip Gillaspy6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSteven Payne / Martez Banks vs Dennis Bird / John Anderson6-3, 6-1
2025-06-11vs Utah/Taylor/55&O/8.0MSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJack Andrews / James Payne vs Robert Folsom / Bret Durfee4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSteven Black / Derek Ollivier vs Paul Lewis / Brent Barber7-5, 6-4
2025-06-07vs Utah/Taylor/55&O/8.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesTim Otto / Chuck Russell vs George Taylor / Francisco Rubio6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Brodie / Steven Hutchinson vs Bret Durfee / Kerry Perez2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMartez Banks / Steven Black vs M Vinson Miner / Brent Barber6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-04vs Liberty Park-Bird BudsWon 20
W#2 DoublesJames Payne / Jack Andrews vs John Anderson / Phillip Gillaspy6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMartez Banks / Brad Gause vs Spero Musuris / Gopal Chemiti3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-17vs Liberty Park-Bird BudsWon 20
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Brodie / Steven Payne vs Phillip Gillaspy / Dennis Bird6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJack Andrews / Steven Black vs Rick Hagen / Craig Hendrix6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Utah/Taylor/55&O/8.0M7120411168
2Sports Mall-Jones5315921198
3Liberty Park-Bird Buds0812347278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Chuck Russell
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.89
Stephen Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.81
Jack Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Martez Banks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Derek Ollivier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
James Payne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Brad Gause
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Jim Jones
published
3.37
TROY GRANGER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jeffrey Brodie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Black
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Hutchinson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Steven Payne
published
Tim Otto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Payne + Steven Payne351958% games+3.9% vs expected
Chuck Russell + Stephen Thompson8261% games+3.2% vs expected
TROY GRANGER + Jim Jones3842% gamesnot enough data
Chuck Russell + Steven Black3361% gamesnot enough data
Brad Gause + TROY GRANGER3259% gamesnot enough data
Steven Black + James Payne314 matchesnot enough data
Steven Hutchinson + Tim Otto224 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Brodie + Chuck Russell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chuck Russell
93W–32L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
Stephen Thompson
62W–21L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
Jack Andrews
20W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Martez Banks
32W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Derek Ollivier
32W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
4
James Payne
70W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Brad Gause
57W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jim Jones
28W–37L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
TROY GRANGER
69W–120L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Jeffrey Brodie
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Black
37W–41L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Hutchinson
5W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Payne
44W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Otto
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.