Teams

Midtown - Alberto

2022 Broward Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-20vs Ltc - PainterLost 01
L#1 DoublesEnrique Bonifaz / Todd Schwartz vs Kelly Painter / James Ward7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2022-09-15vs Midtown - EisenbergLost 01
L#3 DoublesEnrique Bonifaz / Todd Schwartz vs ROBERTO ANTONIO / Rafael Oropeza7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-16vs Broward - Quigley/Les/SantiLost 01
L#1 DoublesPipo Torrellas / Todd Schwartz vs Giovanni Guido / CHRISTIAN ORELLANA3-6, 4-6
2022-08-09vs Broward - Quigley/Les/SantiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPipo Torrellas / Todd Schwartz vs David Williams / Alfredo Tellez6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGregorio Rodriguez R - * / Roberto Ribas vs Ronen Bickel / Stephen Markward0-6, 6-7
2022-08-02vs Piccolo - FrancoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlejandro Matheus / Ervin Mendel vs Gregorio Rodriguez R - * / Roberto Ribas2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPipo Torrellas / Todd Schwartz vs Augusto Alizo / Josue Solano6-2, 6-4
2022-07-19vs Midtown - EisenbergLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlberto Ettedgui / Pipo Torrellas vs Haim Sasson / Alan Benarroch6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMiguel Alvarado / Enrique Bonifaz vs Ismael Betancourt / ROBERTO ANTONIO3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Pipo Torrellas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.25
Gregorio Rodriguez R
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Daniel Caminata
published 4.5
3.87
Todd Schwartz
published
3.87
Enrique Bonifaz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Roberto Ribas
published
3.67
Alberto Ettedgui
published 4
3.34
Jorge Torres
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Enrique Bonifaz + Jorge Torres5250% games+14.2% vs expected
Pipo Torrellas + Enrique Bonifaz6261% games+1.3% vs expected
Gregorio Rodriguez R + Daniel Caminata6359% games−1.1% vs expected
Alberto Ettedgui + Enrique Bonifaz3347% games−3.3% vs expected
Gregorio Rodriguez R + Pipo Torrellas1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pipo Torrellas
175W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Gregorio Rodriguez R
44W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Daniel Caminata
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Todd Schwartz
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Enrique Bonifaz
144W–73L career · type A · 10 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
CHRISTIAN SCHRODER
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roberto Ribas
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Alberto Ettedgui
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Jorge Torres
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.