Teams

MBehan-HVCC

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-26vs JCollins-SVCWon 21
L#1 SinglesAnna Jessup vs Sarah Tuttle1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCara Fong vs Jessica Winger6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMaria Behan vs Brandi Vanderwalker6-1, 6-2
2026-06-26Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCara Fong vs Beth Gifford6-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMaria Behan vs Anne Sherman2-6, 2-6
2026-06-19vs ABoone-TOCHSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCara Fong vs Ashleigh White6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMaria Behan vs Cameron Mckinzie1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-05vs SBartle-DURSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnne Lucas vs Viktoriia Saibel0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAshley Perry vs Jennifer Harrell6-2, 6-2
2026-05-22vs AWallace-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesMaria Behan vs Sarah Mangels2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Jessup vs Alexa Wallace1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAnne Lucas vs Donnetta Hanson2-6, 3-6
2026-05-15vs RLatson-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesLindsay Kolzet vs Hannah Gahagan0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMaria Behan vs Sophia Ewing1-6, 3-6
2026-05-04vs JCollins-SVCWon 21
W#1 SinglesAshley Perry vs Jessica Winger6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMaria Behan vs Sarah Tuttle2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAnna Jessup vs Lori Small7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AWallace-DUR6217715157
2RLatson-DUR6217716135
3ABoone-TOCH5315923189
4MBehan-HVCC2661836236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Cara Fong
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 2.5
2.42
Ashley Perry
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.28
Maria Behan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
1.96
Anna Jessup
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.88
Anne Lucas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
1.86
Lindsay Kolzet
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Cara Fong
17W–21L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Ashley Perry
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
Maria Behan
6W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Anna Jessup
1W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
2.5
Anne Lucas
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Lindsay Kolzet
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.