Teams

FTC - Ferguson

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '24 · Men 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-05vs NTC - DouseLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Manz / Tyler Melvin vs Nicholas Simmons / David Farr4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJames Lowe vs Cory Zylstra4-6, 4-6
2024-11-18vs CCRC - LyonsLost 03
L#1 DoublesTyler Melvin / Robert Manz vs Gagan Batra / Bradley Carter0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMark Coleman vs Hunter Reid6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJames Lowe vs Kaj-Reem Robinson1-6, 2-6
2024-11-05vs Woodside - CrenshawWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Manz / James Lowe vs Patrick Daly / Benjamin Proctor6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-10-24vs CCRC - ScraperWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Manz / Ashish Gohel vs Damon Wright / William Wolfe1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMark Coleman vs Joel Scraper6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDarius Lawson vs Gregory Mahoney6-2, 6-2
2024-09-19vs Woodside - CrenshawWon 31
W#1 DoublesDarius Lawson / Mark Coleman vs Benjamin Proctor / Forrest Anderson7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBlake Elam vs Jeffrey Crenshaw6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJonathan Baker / Robert Manz vs Jeffrey Homan / Will Chafin7-6, 3-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Ferguson / Ashish Gohel vs David Bivins / Scott Neel6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-09-12vs CCRC - ScraperWon 32
L#1 DoublesNathaniel Davidson / James Lowe vs Damon Wright / Edward Burr3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBlake Elam vs Maxwell Morgan6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichael Ferguson / Amitabh Singh vs Daryl Flink / Gregory Mahoney5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMark Coleman vs Joel Scraper6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDarius Lawson / Robert Manz vs Santoine Lee / Christopher Bayne6-1, 6-1
2024-08-29vs RVP - FlennerWon 50
W#1 DoublesNathaniel Davidson / James Lowe vs Brandon Brewer / Ted Olsen-Tank6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMark Coleman vs Jameel Campbell6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBlake Elam / Robert Stewart vs Greg Reed / Joshua Frederick6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesShiquan Brown vs Scott Flenner6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmitabh Singh / Robert Manz vs Joseph Harris / Michael Starr6-0, 6-0
2024-08-22vs CCRC - LyonsLost 23
L#1 DoublesTyler Melvin / James Lowe vs Eddie Miranda / Hunter Reid0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBlake Elam vs Joseph Kyser6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRobert Stewart / Shiquan Brown vs Ross Lyons / Kaj-Reem Robinson7-6, 2-1
L#2 SinglesFranklin Brown vs Cory Muncill5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRobert Manz / Jonathan Baker vs Scott McWhorter / Christopher Payne1-6, 6-7
2024-08-15vs NTC - DouseWon 40
W#1 DoublesDarius Lawson / Blake Elam vs Kyle Caver / Andrew Payton6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMark Coleman vs Russell Fernandes6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Stewart / Shiquan Brown vs Austin Rich / David Farr6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesFranklin Brown vs Dave Besel6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Men 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCRC - Lyons8139614204
2CCRC - Scraper54252043332
3NTC - Douse45222349352
4FTC - Ferguson34152040294
5Woodside - Crenshaw34132248342
6RVP - Flenner1662959369

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Blake Elam
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.05
Jonathan Baker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Darius Lawson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Franklin Brown
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
James Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.61
Ashish Gohel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.56
Robert Manz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Amitabh Singh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Coleman
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Singles 36% · published
Nathaniel Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shiquan Brown
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tyler Melvin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Manz + Jonathan Baker7748% games−9.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Blake Elam
30W–3L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Jonathan Baker
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Darius Lawson
17W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Franklin Brown
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
James Lowe
3W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Ashish Gohel
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%20%80%
2.61
Robert Manz
16W–27L career · 8 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Amitabh Singh
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Coleman
15W–8L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathaniel Davidson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shiquan Brown
15W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Melvin
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.