Teams

BRY: Joan Steere

2025 RI Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.60 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2025-08-20vs WB: Krueger/JosloffWon 21
L#1 DoublesRenee Rousselle / Erica Doran vs Doreen Clappin / Hannah Siener2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Mello / Laurie LaBelle vs Katherine Tolsdorf / Deborah Olisky6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRhonda Carvalhal / Cheryl Abbatematteo vs Tracey Kehoe / Janet Marrinan6-2, 6-2
2025-08-18vs EB: 55-LUV/PippittLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiana Adamczyk / Kathleen Mello vs Kazue Yamamoto / Josie Richmond3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie LaBelle / Rhonda Carvalhal vs Laura Pippitt / Valerie Welch3-6, 2-6
2025-08-16vs WB: Krueger/JosloffWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Carvalhal / Jessica Pendleton vs Karen McCurdy / Deborah Olisky6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKathleen Mello / JENNY QI vs Doreen Clappin / Hannah Siener7-5, 3-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Linton / Claudia Pryor vs Jayne Josloff / Tracey Kehoe6-7, 4-2, 1-0
2025-08-14vs WB: ZizzaLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie LaBelle / Kathleen Mello vs Barbara Gradley / Zoe Kelliher1-6, 2-6
2025-08-07vs FC: Lob Ladies/FarrellWon 20
W#1 DoublesMIchele Green / Lauri Burke vs Deborah Golden / Kathleen Farrell6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSandra O'Leary / Laurie LaBelle vs Garly Chan / Jayne Bedigian6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesRhonda Carvalhal / Jessica Pendleton vs Cathy Davis / Dawn Curran3-6, 7-6, 3-2
W#2 DoublesSandra O'Leary / Mary Lou Kennedy vs Roberta Preve / Deanna Detorie2-6, 6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Mello / Laurie LaBelle vs Christine Munro / Deborah Robertson6-2, 6-3
2025-08-02vs EB: 55-LUV/PippittLost 12
W#1 DoublesMIchele Green / Karen Bodell vs Elise Gonzalez / Kazue Yamamoto6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiana Adamczyk / Kathleen Mello vs Laura Pippitt / Ann Foster4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary Lou Kennedy / Laurie LaBelle vs Karen Genereux / Lidia Pierce3-6, 1-6
2025-07-27vs WB: SimoniniSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMIchele Green / Karen Bodell vs Deb Poirier / Patricia Sylvia6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDiana Adamczyk / Kathleen Mello vs Kristin Maggiacomo / MaryLou Knight1-6, 6-3, 1-6
2025-07-21vs FC: Lob Ladies/FarrellWon 30
W#1 DoublesMIchele Green / Renee Chace vs Cynthia Gavin / Laurie Ogilvie6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Pendleton / Laurie LaBelle vs Elizabeth Hale / Karen Angelone6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Abbatematteo / Claudia Pryor vs Nancy Ruo / Roseanne Simmons6-2, 6-2
2025-07-16vs WB: SimoniniLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeborah Panzica / Anna Kyriakides vs Tina Osborn / Patricia Sylvia1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSandra O'Leary / Mary Lou Kennedy vs Colleen Salvatore / Tracey Clarke6-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesRhonda Carvalhal / Kathleen Mello vs Roberta Preve / Dawn Curran7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatherine Linton / Claudia Pryor vs Kathy Buck / Valerie Welch2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Abbatematteo / Renee Rousselle vs Chryssa Udvardy / Christine Munro3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesRhonda Carvalhal / Kathleen Mello vs Kimsoo Seawell / Heather Shaver6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Lou Kennedy / Renee Chace vs Nancy Nunes / Leanna Kehm6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKatherine Linton / Erica Doran vs Katherine Mainzer / Ann Guinan1-6, 6-3, 0-6
L#1 DoublesSandra O'Leary / Rhonda Carvalhal vs Cynthia Sexton / Kimsoo Seawell4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMIchele Green / Lauri Burke vs Rebecca Reo / Barbara Gradley6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaurie LaBelle / JENNY QI vs Susan Darby / Maureen Maurer5-7, 6-5, 1-0
2025-06-02vs WB: ZizzaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDiana Adamczyk / Deborah Panzica vs Ann Guinan / Stephanie Marchand5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Kyriakides / Kathleen Mello vs Sally Doire / Alice Porter3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
MIchele Green
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Deborah Panzica
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Mary Lou Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Jessica Pendleton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Kathleen Mello
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.34
Laurie LaBelle
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.28
Rhonda Carvalhal
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.27
Katherine Linton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Erica Doran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
JENNY QI
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Sandra O'Leary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Claudia Pryor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Cheryl Abbatematteo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Renee Chace
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Renee Rousselle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Lauri Burke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Joan Steere
published
MaryAnne Borges
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Lou Kennedy + Sandra O'Leary121052% games+8.4% vs expected
Katherine Linton + Rhonda Carvalhal5357% games+7.1% vs expected
Jessica Pendleton + Rhonda Carvalhal361062% games+7.0% vs expected
JENNY QI + Sandra O'Leary6358% games+1.9% vs expected
JENNY QI + Rhonda Carvalhal2344% games−5.1% vs expected
Renee Chace + Renee Rousselle4445% games−7.0% vs expected
Cheryl Abbatematteo + Renee Rousselle6451% gamesnot enough data
Lauri Burke + Renee Rousselle5451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MIchele Green
142W–81L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.01
4
Deborah Panzica
51W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Lou Kennedy
72W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
Jessica Pendleton
148W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Kathleen Mello
113W–49L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Laurie LaBelle
70W–60L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Rhonda Carvalhal
253W–88L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Katherine Linton
66W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Erica Doran
64W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
JENNY QI
79W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Sandra O'Leary
80W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Claudia Pryor
55W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Cheryl Abbatematteo
76W–79L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Renee Chace
124W–86L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Renee Rousselle
109W–85L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Lauri Burke
85W–95L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
Joan Steere
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
MaryAnne Borges
73W–54L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.