Teams

Franklin - BCC 3.5

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-05vs Korolkoff - Chicks With SticksWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Byrne / Jennifer Winston vs Desiree Nichtula / Joanne Rome6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShari Gronvall / Ivey Castleberry vs Lisa Raker / Lisa Smith6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmanda Franklin / Lauren Tintchev vs Jayne Korolkoff / Kristen Moshyedi6-2, 6-3
2024-10-31vs Dobson - LakewoodLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Byrne / Jennifer Najar vs Carol Maio / Jody Sklar2-6, 4-6
2024-10-21vs Donellan-Manor 3.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesShari Gronvall / Cariza McCarthy vs Lisa Johnson / Cybelle Long6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaura O'Keefe / Beata Glover Salamon vs Melissa Valencia / Maureen Smith3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Franklin / Astrid Ruggeri vs Dawn Willard / Patty Lynch3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Lauren Tintchev
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Beata Glover Salamon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Catherine Byrne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christina Pohoryles
published 3.5
3.17
Amanda Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Ivey Castleberry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Laura O'Keefe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Cariza McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Astrid Ruggeri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jennifer Winston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melanie Wine
published
Nicole Urbanczyk
published
Shari Gronvall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ivey Castleberry + Catherine Byrne033 matchesnot enough data
Ivey Castleberry + Lauren Tintchev123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Tintchev + Amanda Franklin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Tintchev
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Beata Glover Salamon
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Byrne
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Christina Pohoryles
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Amanda Franklin
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Ivey Castleberry
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
Laura O'Keefe
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Cariza McCarthy
5W–2L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Astrid Ruggeri
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Winston
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Melanie Wine
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Urbanczyk
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shari Gronvall
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.