Teams

KY\Lex\Begley-Fakharpour

2022 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
RHONDA HOWARD
published
Akemi Meaney
published 3.5
Catherine Sauvage
published 3.5
Dorothy Ross
published 3.5
3.23
Lynn Littrell
published
3.20
Cindy Antonelli
published 3.5
3.19
Janet Lewis
published
3.18
Mary Diggins
published
3.08
Mary Ferlan
published
3.03
Betty Grey
published 3.5
2.95
Leslie Nuckols
published
Mary Fakharpour
published
Mendy Blair
published
Nina Begley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Ferlan + Betty Grey4156% games−6.8% vs expected
Mary Diggins + Nina Begley0527% gamesnot enough data
Mary Fakharpour + Betty Grey0531% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

RHONDA HOWARD
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Akemi Meaney
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Sauvage
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dorothy Ross
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Littrell
17W–29L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Cindy Antonelli
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Janet Lewis
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
Mary Diggins
20W–32L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Mary Ferlan
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Betty Grey
14W–40L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
Leslie Nuckols
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
Mary Fakharpour
3W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mendy Blair
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nina Begley
11W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.