← Teams

CAC-Ramsey

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Michele Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.32
Lisa Clevenger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Christopher Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Michael Stone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Paula Conway
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Douglas Walker
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Nozomi Bray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Anthony Guzzi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-05-24Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Steve Snyder vs Julie Ahn / Mitchell Todd6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaula Conway / Jim Fisher vs Cathy Zagunis / Robert Crawford3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Ramsey / Christopher Shaw vs Dipali Dixit / Manoj Agnihotri6-3, 6-1
2025-05-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLisa Clevenger / Christopher Shaw vs Angie Lee / Zhong Lei7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNozomi Bray / Kevin Grainger vs Diana Blebea / Neal Burgstahler1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarje Ferek / Douglas Walker vs Maria Kosmetatos / Hoover Li6-0, 0-6, 1-0
2025-05-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLisa Clevenger / Christopher Shaw vs Sandra Ellis / Jeff Gonzales6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Ramsey / Michael Stone vs Cheryl Roloff / Jeff Mcdougald6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPaula Conway / Jim Fisher vs Bonnie Bailey / Jim Mounts7-5, 6-4
2025-05-10Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesAnthony Guzzi / Marje Ferek vs Andrea Vicino / Dan Iorga6-0, 6-4
2025-05-02Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Douglas Walker vs Gretchen Newcomb / Richard Nobleman6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPaula Conway / Anthony Guzzi vs Sarah Mutal / Ian Little6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNozomi Bray / Steve Snyder vs Jennifer Pultz / Michael Archer6-4, 6-4
2025-04-27Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMarje Ferek / Christopher Shaw vs Heike Droste / Jason Dortch7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Clevenger / Douglas Walker vs Vivian Nguyen / Tom Grissom6-4, 6-1
2025-03-30Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMarje Ferek / Michael Stone vs Teresa Darling / Mitchell Whitehurst6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnthony Guzzi / Nozomi Bray vs Larry Liu / Janet Mills6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Snyder / Jim Fisher vs Frank Brown / Rochelle Pluymers5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-15Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKathy Ramsey / Christopher Shaw vs Victoria Cartwright / Scott Cartwright7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLisa Clevenger / Kevin Grainger vs Amy Murphy / Bruce Trubo6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichele Snyder / Steve Snyder vs Mary Hlady / Mark Beilstein6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%97%2%
3.36
3.5
Lisa Clevenger
25W–50L career
0%98%1%
3.32
3.5
Christopher Shaw
65W–55L career
5%93%2%
3.25
3.5
Michael Stone
26W–44L career
3%96%1%
3.24
3.5
Paula Conway
48W–75L career
5%95%0%
3.17
3.5
Douglas Walker
74W–82L career
8%92%0%
3.16
3
Nozomi Bray
60W–110L career
0%99%1%
2.83
3
Anthony Guzzi
20W–54L career · type S
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.