Teams

Mood Swingers

2023 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 4.08 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-05-03vs Up the CreekLost 01
L#1 SinglesKayce McEwan vs Suzie Sabala5-7, 2-6
2023-05-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKayce McEwan / Lisa Diehr vs Maryann Moorhead / Diana Gastanaga4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Awe Shank Redemption9030618238
2Mood Swingers45122451367
3Group Therapy 4.536171946364
4Up the Creek27132350366

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Andrea Gillis
published 4.5
Ekaterina Baxter
published 4.5
4.09
Anya Sandusky
published 4
4.03
Kayce McEwan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.97
Kristen Jacobs
published 4
3.92
Jessica Jensen
published
3.87
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.86
Beth Calvo
published 4
3.82
Robyn Roby
published 4
3.81
Lisa Diehr
published 4
3.68
Jeanna Rice
published 4
3.65
Lisa Hulsman
published 4
3.62
Becky Caven
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anya Sandusky + Suzanna Murali15559% games+5.3% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Beth Calvo14657% games+4.5% vs expected
Lisa Diehr + Jessica Jensen8552% games+3.1% vs expected
Kristen Jacobs + Beth Calvo11555% games+2.7% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Becky Caven471958% games+2.1% vs expected
Lisa Diehr + Becky Caven6852% games+1.9% vs expected
Anya Sandusky + Robyn Roby241453% games+1.9% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Andrea Gillis7649% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrea Gillis
98W–57L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Ekaterina Baxter
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Anya Sandusky
211W–108L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
4.09
4
Kayce McEwan
147W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Kristen Jacobs
212W–92L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.97
Jessica Jensen
84W–78L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Suzanna Murali
297W–165L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Beth Calvo
172W–128L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Robyn Roby
394W–189L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Lisa Diehr
92W–87L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Jeanna Rice
126W–91L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Lisa Hulsman
68W–50L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Becky Caven
228W–146L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.