Teams

UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Williams)

2026 UPTA Tri-Level 18 & Over · 18+ TL Men - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-21vs UPTA18TL/Sidhu/ACACWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdalberto Taguchi / David Weise vs Luke Reynolds / Garret Conover6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJosh Burton / Ryan Sgro vs Adam Thompson / Hugo Juarez6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Adams / Patrick Hill vs Manthira Chidambaram / Robert Storey3-6, 6-7
2026-07-21vs UPTA18TL/Nguyen/BrookstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesNate Adams / Jay Kianos vs Andrew Pettus / Scott Mouzon6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRyan Sgro / Jake Davenport vs Colin Gallagher / Pieter Swanepoel6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPierpaolo Baldisserotto / Patrick Hill vs Edward Jones / Karthik Ramaratnam6-4, 6-0
2026-07-07vs UPTA18TL/Fox/BrookstoneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJay Kianos / William Hochet vs Matthew Fox / Stephen Brown2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPalmer Williams / Josh Burton vs Troy Botts / Johnny Pack6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-27vs UPTA18TL/Shinpoch/ACACWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Hochet / Adalberto Taguchi vs Frank Powell / Daryl Tracey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPalmer Williams / Ryan Sgro vs Jon Shinpoch / Christopher Fisher6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSean Teaster / Benjamin Adams vs Christopher Hein / Brian Himes1-6, 0-6
2026-06-20vs UPTA18TL/Kessler/Neely FarmWon 30
W#1 DoublesJay Kianos / William Hochet vs Scott Juvelier / Brad Heyde6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPalmer Williams / Jake Davenport vs Richard Gajewski / Kenneth Hoyer7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Adams / Patrick Hill vs Rob Lewis / Thomas Stephens6-4, 6-4
2026-06-08vs UPTA18T/Russell/KrocWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdalberto Taguchi / David Weise vs Patrick OFriel / Bryce Geistfeld4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJosh Burton / Ryan Sgro vs Dennis Gillan / Nathaniel Futral3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPierpaolo Baldisserotto / Benjamin Adams vs Curtis Potvin / David Wright3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-06vs UPTA18TL/Wise/NeelyFarmWon 21
L#1 DoublesNate Adams / Adalberto Taguchi vs Mike Wise / Sebastian Schneider7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPalmer Williams / Josh Burton vs Vijay Bhasker Madaramaoni / Daniel Dukes6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSean Teaster / Benjamin Adams vs Michael Isaacs / Derek Nelson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 18+ TL Men - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Williams)7016514159
2UPTA18TL/Shinpoch/ACAC611838157
3UPTA18TL/Sidhu/ACAC43101123195
4UPTA18T/Russell/Kroc43111025205
5UPTA18TL/Fox/Brookstone25101123161
6UPTA18TL/Kessler/Neely Farm2571431204
7UPTA18TL/Wise/NeelyFarm2571432224
8UPTA18TL/Nguyen/Brookstone1641736233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
David Weise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Adalberto Taguchi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Jay Kianos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
William Hochet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Palmer Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Ryan Sgro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Jake Davenport
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Brent Graeber
published 3
2.97
Pierpaolo Baldisserotto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Sean Teaster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Patrick Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Benjamin Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Nate Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Benjamin Adams + Brent Graeber6169% games+18.6% vs expected
Jay Kianos + Adalberto Taguchi8169% games+11.1% vs expected
Benjamin Adams + Patrick Hill3254% games+4.3% vs expected
David Weise + Jay Kianos3254% games−2.1% vs expected
Sean Teaster + Benjamin Adams1440% gamesnot enough data
Benjamin Adams + Pierpaolo Baldisserotto4157% gamesnot enough data
David Weise + William Hochet303 matchesnot enough data
David Weise + Adalberto Taguchi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Weise
26W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
4.09
4
Adalberto Taguchi
34W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.97
Jay Kianos
22W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.88
William Hochet
46W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Palmer Williams
36W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.79
Ryan Sgro
27W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.50
3.5
Jake Davenport
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
3
Brent Graeber
21W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.20
Pierpaolo Baldisserotto
18W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
Sean Teaster
26W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
2.94
Patrick Hill
29W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Benjamin Adams
34W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Nate Adams
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.