Teams

LA - MountainGate

2023 USTA MxD 40 & Over - LA · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-26vs LA - Kiss My AceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGeraldine Farrell / Bruce Hofert vs Hai Vu / Parul Sanghai6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Shih / Carlos Yguico vs Kevin Rodriguez / Stephanie Salomon4-6, 0-6
2023-08-12vs LA - Wise AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Chall / Jodi Chall vs Tomer David Rapaport / Julie Sato4-6, 4-6
2023-07-23vs LA - Wise AcesWon 20
W#2 DoublesBruce Hofert / Cindy Shih vs Leo Levinson / Lauren Giordano6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael Chall / Jodi Chall vs Samir Hessami / Suzi Spear6-2, 6-0
2023-07-16vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 02
L#1 DoublesJOSH KLEINBERG / Parisa Morris vs Sylvia DSouza / Jeffrey Blatt3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Chall / Jodi Chall vs In-Tae Bae / Debbie Zolla6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-07-08vs LA-LLW-LATC-Karen ChouLost 02
L#1 DoublesBruce Hofert / Cindy Shih vs Ivan Fatovic / Hilary Marx1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJodi Chall / Michael Chall vs Ali Baird / Satish Subramanian7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Parisa Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Bruce Hofert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Jennifer Bevan
published
2.90
Bethany Nelson
published 3
2.82
Jodi Chall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Cindy Shih
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Geraldine Farrell
published
2.77
Laura Winslow
published
2.59
Anette Levine
published 3
JOSH KLEINBERG
published
Michael Chall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodi Chall + Bethany Nelson7456% games+7.4% vs expected
Jodi Chall + Cindy Shih2346% gamesnot enough data
Bruce Hofert + Cindy Shih213 matchesnot enough data
Anette Levine + Laura Winslow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Parisa Morris
75W–40L career · 1 line in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Bruce Hofert
58W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Jennifer Bevan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3
Bethany Nelson
19W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Jodi Chall
43W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cindy Shih
69W–99L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
Geraldine Farrell
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Laura Winslow
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Anette Levine
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
2.59
JOSH KLEINBERG
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Chall
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.