← Teams

N OR-CAC-Birkhofer

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Liz DelPlato
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Penny Birkhofer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.63
Katherine Kralj
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Donna Roisom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Marie Picard
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Carol Chiu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Results8 ties
2025-05-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTami Oglesby / Carol Chiu vs Teresa Neal / Deborah Borchers6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLiz DelPlato / Marie Picard vs Kimberly Cunningham / Sharon Grilley6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Katherine Kralj vs Becky Rey / Yumiko Pike7-6, 7-5
2025-05-09Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesLiz DelPlato / Marie Picard vs Becky Rey / Yumiko Pike6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Tami Oglesby vs Kimberly Cunningham / Sharon Grilley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLee Havens / Donna Roisom vs Judith Kobin / Claire Thayer6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-25Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesMarie Picard / Donna Roisom vs Susan Suttich / Carla Wheeler6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Chiu / Linda Lovett vs Julia Karlin / Joan Major6-2, 6-3
2025-04-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDonna Roisom / Lee Havens vs Teresa Neal / Deborah Borchers5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElda Nelson / Linda Lovett vs Carol Briggs / Jan Rothert3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Kathleen Goodfriend vs Judith Kobin / Claire Thayer7-6, 6-2
2025-04-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLee Havens / Donna Roisom vs Nancy Atkins / Susan Suttich7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Elda Nelson vs Marcia Baisch / Mary Sides6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Goodfriend / Katherine Kralj vs Kathleen Schlickeiser / Joan Major6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-04Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesLee Havens / Marie Picard vs Kathleen Schlickeiser / Terri Pickard6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Chiu / Liz DelPlato vs Nancy Atkins / Susan Suttich7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Tami Oglesby vs Marcia Baisch / Kathleen Budnick7-5, 6-1
2025-04-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDonna Roisom / Kathleen Goodfriend vs Yumiko Pike / Deborah Borchers7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Katherine Kralj vs Kim Stevens / Tamara Witcosky6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Marie Picard vs Judith Kobin / Mary Anderson6-2, 6-4
2025-03-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCarol Chiu / Liz DelPlato vs Kathleen Budnick / Carla Wheeler3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Donna Roisom vs Kathleen Schlickeiser / Joan Major6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElda Nelson / Marie Picard vs Charleen Straub / Mary Head6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Liz DelPlato
124W–99L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Penny Birkhofer
68W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Katherine Kralj
142W–116L career
6%94%0%
3.63
4
Donna Roisom
100W–85L career
9%91%0%
3.63
4
Marie Picard
128W–96L career
18%82%0%
3.57
4
Carol Chiu
87W–73L career
19%81%0%
3.56

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.