Teams

OC Lifetime - Bev

2025 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 4.0W WD

15 players · average NTRP 3.72 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-18vs OC Dana Hills - SueLost 14
L#1 DoublesChristine Reenders / Lynn Moore vs Carrie Anderson / Denise Banks6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPamela Lewis vs Vivian Nevin4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJILL ESLICK / Tricia Collins vs Sue Shin / Lynn Kamada7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesBarbara Springer vs Sahar Kamali1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDarlene Redburn / Karen Berman vs Suzanne Corvese / Suzanna Wu6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-23vs OC Coto De Caza - TracieLost 14
L#1 DoublesNina Ames / Christine Reenders vs Erin King / Melissa MacLeod2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAnnette Drake vs Kelly Coste6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCrosby Burke / JILL ESLICK vs Haleigh Crabtree / Tana Ashton3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCristina McLamb vs Tracie Reed-Furlong3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBev Merwin / Barbara Springer vs Carol Teskey / Deborah Todd0-6, 1-6
2025-05-02vs OC Dana Hills TC - Dara 10:30Lost 23
L#1 DoublesLynn Moore / Amy Schetman vs Lyndsay Boberg / Sara Wiens1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnnette Drake vs Dara Luangpraseut6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJILL ESLICK / Darlene Redburn vs Kelly Dishno / Kristin Pokrass3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCristina McLamb vs JENNIFER BRASCH1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNina Ames / Audra Giddings vs Michelle Espeleta / Libby Perry6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0W WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Christine Reenders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Annette Drake
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.76
Audra Giddings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Amy Schetman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Patty Podley
published
3.69
Pamela Lewis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.59
Sonia Bishop
published
3.59
JILL ESLICK
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Nina Ames
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Bev Merwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Crosby Burke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Ursula Cassinelli
published
3.42
Cristina McLamb
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Barbara Springer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Darlene Redburn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Springer + Crosby Burke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Reenders
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Annette Drake
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
4
Audra Giddings
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Amy Schetman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patty Podley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
Pamela Lewis
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.69
Sonia Bishop
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
JILL ESLICK
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
Nina Ames
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Bev Merwin
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Crosby Burke
22W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Ursula Cassinelli
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Cristina McLamb
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Barbara Springer
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Darlene Redburn
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.