Teams

R.Duggins 40+

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-01vs M.Benecky 40 3.5MenWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephen Jorge / Mike Kaelin vs James Mellott / David Mize6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScott Patton / Earl Struble vs Michael Benecky / Mike Boisjolie6-2, 6-0
2023-04-24vs P.GugliottaLost 02
L#1 SinglesJohn Parham vs Darian Spell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMike Kaelin / Ronnie Duncan vs Omar EL-Kaissi / Jeff Abercrombie4-6, 6-7
2023-04-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Kaelin / Stephen Jorge vs Tony Kattan / Chance Wright4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-10vs B.Kaulback Spring 40+Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJohn Parham vs Douglas Marks3-6, 4-6
2023-03-13vs A.McKay/CCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Richardson / Mike Kaelin vs David Burkhardt / Richard Proctor3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Parham vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesScott Patton / Robert Marriott vs Douglas Vaughn / James Burke6-3, 6-3
2023-03-06vs D.HuffmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Kaelin / Robert Marriott vs Scott Abee / Robert O'Han3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Roy Kelly
published
3.44
Mike Kaelin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Scott Patton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
John Parham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.26
McNair Bell
published
3.24
Robert Marriott
published
3.20
Ronnie Duncan
published
3.16
John Richardson
published
3.14
Ken Trefzger
published
Jason DeGroff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Patton + McNair Bell3447% gamesnot enough data
McNair Bell + John Parham4160% gamesnot enough data
Scott Patton + John Parham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roy Kelly
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Mike Kaelin
103W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
Scott Patton
41W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
John Parham
57W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
McNair Bell
34W–21L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Robert Marriott
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Ronnie Duncan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
John Richardson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Ken Trefzger
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Jason DeGroff
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.